Brokeback Watchtower, you gave some points
to think. Yet I disagree with you.
The strongest argument against any
nihilism is that it is ultimately impossible to believe in the nihilism itself
if you purport to believe in nothing. That means nihilism is not an important
subject but it appeared as the offspring of some special circumstance. Yet
there is nothing wrong in that nihilism appeared because people go mad after seeing many
perspectives such as ‘there is no truth, truth is relative, truth is absolute,
truth is God …. etc.’ So is the case with other related subjects. Sadly, conflicted
religions and their scriptures add to this confusion. Hence the question
arises: Is truth really a complicated subject? What is the truth about truth?
One may feel truth changes according to circumstances. For example, to the
question “Is water life-saving?” one may say “yes” because drinking water in
moderation helps; yet another one would say “no” because drinking water more
harms. To the question “Does the sun rise in the east?” One may say “Yes, sun
rises in the East (which is right for the ordinary); another one may say “No, where
the sun rises is East” (which is right for the educated); another one may say
“No, sun neither rises nor sets” (which is right for the highly educated ones).
Something that is true could be false in larger perspective. For example, when
a traitor is dismissed, the management might explain he used his truthfulness
to make the entry with the ulterior aim of undermining company’s good-will, which
means truth used as a means for a greater evil is actually part of falsehood.
In contrast, something that is wrong could be right at another time. Driving
the vehicle without headlight on is wrong, yet right during war-time because it
ensures well-being of the whole citizens.
Many would say they believe only what can be ascertained by their senses
which means experience is the key. But we can be tricked even by our own
experience. (1) Lukewarm water would be felt as cold water if you touch it after dipping your finger in hot water; and the same lukewarm
water would be felt as warm water if you touch it after dipping your finger in
cold water. (2) Senses can sometimes give only half-truth. When you see cards
arranged as a pyramid you do not see more important aspect of it—forces acting
in various directions, nullifying each other thus making the pyramid shape
possible.
If mind can be
tricked by what physical our eyes see, how much more it would be tricked when
it ventures into the realm of the invisible such as What is before and after
this life … What was before Big Bang or God, What is His purpose for us …etc.
This explains why we have conflicted religions and scriptures which prompt
people to say there is no truth, or truth is relative. Yet for an analytical
mind truth is not a complicated subject because they find out that there are
truths that are relative and there are truths that are absolute. For example,
Mike Gallagher declared: “Right and wrong are not relative terms. There are
fundamental truths. Evil flourishes, but good men continue to battle it – and
win.” Interestingly, everyone knows what is right and wrong because people are
quick to notice the wrong when it is committed by others [which means they know
what is wrong] and are quick to seek glory for the good when it is committed by
them [which means they know what is right]. That means those who say truth is
relative have a limited view. They are like a farmer who
describes a plant as useless calling it a weed without knowing it is highly valuable
for herbalists, or like those who dismiss Cause and Consequence Principle (that says “you reap what you
sow”) as useless without knowing that there are many who derive great benefits
from this principle by doing good and thus receiving good in return.
Thus the big picture shows that there are truths that are relative and
there are truths that are absolute. In other words, what exists for a limited
period is real/true for a limited period, and what exists for unlimited period
is real/true for unlimited period. For example, a seed has a physical
appearance which exists for a limited period; yet more importantly it has an
invisible software program in which all its billions and billions of future
generations remain protected and this invisible aspect can be called true for unlimited
period. This applies to humans too. Our body which is destined to grow to
maturity and to finally disintegrate is real for a limited period, yet more
importantly life, the invisible software-like entity acting through the visible
body is real for unlimited period about which we are unable to study because it is invisible and immaterial.