TheSkyX Professional Edition astronomy software looks very impressiveis and has many features.
Its current price is $349US.
http://www.bisque.com/sc/pages/TheSkyX-Professional-Edition.aspx
Posts by VM44
-
322WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
U.S. Naval Observatory Julian Date Converter
Julian Date to Calendar Date Converter
Calendar Date to Julian Date Converter
http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astronomical-applications/data-services/jul-date
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
You have nothing to prove that what is being said is true.
How about giving her Dr. Steele's original article to read and have her judge for herself if the Watchtower misrepresented what he wrote?
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
Let's try to reproduce the researchers' results.
The freeware software used in the research may be obtained at this web site:
SkyChart / Cartes du Ciel
http://www.ap-i.net/skychart/start
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
Concerning VAT 4956 the article says "Clearly, much of the astonomical data in VAT 4956 fits the year 588 B.C.E as the 37th year of Nebuchadnezzar II." (page 27).
How can the Watchtower author use the word "clearly" in his article when the details of the analysis made by some unnammed researchers are omitted and only the conclusions of the analysis are presented?
Nothing is "clear" at all about article's conclusions concerning VAT 4956.
The omissions make what the article says about VAT 4956 meaningless!
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
Who wants to volunteer to write to The Watchtower asking them how a person can obtain the VAT 4956 astronomical analysis mentioned in the article?
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
VAT 4956 translated (PDF)
http://www.caeno.org/_Feat/pdf/F019_Translation.pdf
Reconstruction of events recorded in VAT 4956
-
33
"The organization has never disappointed us..."
by Franklin Massey inin the simplified english edition of the july 15th, 2011 watchtower, in an article that warns jws about apostate influences, the following quote is given as a reason to stick close to the watchtower organization:.
"the organization has never disappointed us and always gives us an abundance of pure waters of truth from god's word.".
a scan of the page can be found here: http://www.jwfacts.com/images/watchtower-2011-jul-15-p12-apostates.jpg.
-
-
VM44
"The organization has never disappointed us..."
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
VM44
It looks like we are going to have to write The Watchtower to inquire as to who are these "researchers" mentioned in the article, and where one may obtain a copy of their analysis of VAT 4956.
Who wants to do that?
-
322
WT Nov. 1, 2011 (public) - When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed - Part 2
by AnnOMaly inout now.. yes, yes, yessssss!
on p. 26-27 they talk about how the lunar positions on vat 4956 fit 588/7 bce!!!.
"clearly, much of the astronomical data in vat 4956 fits the year 588 b.c.e.
-
-
