In Paragraph 1 after citing Acts 2:22,36,41 in reference to the 3,000 it says 'they would have'been baptised in water in the name of the Father, the Son and holy spirit'.
2 problems with this statement. First, they intentually omit verse 38 where Peter explicitly states they baptised in the name of JESUS.
Second, they omit caps on Holy Spirit.
There is no account in the bible where the disciples baptised in the name of the Father, the Son and Holy Spirit.
There are only 1 of four options here:
Matthew 28:19 is spurious.
The disciples understood that command to mean to baptise in Jesus name only.
They disobeyed Jesus.
The bible writers under inspiration 'forgot' to include that small detail.
Paragraph 2 infers the 3,000 baptised were not annointed like the 120, by comparing the 3,000 baptised to those baptised at their conventions and assemblies 'in the name of' strongly suggest they are insinuating there were 'other sheep' being baptised soon after Jesus death. If the watchtower writers indeed are trying to introduce this concept it most likely due to them wanting to reduce the number of annointed in Jesus' day to prop up there literal 'little flock' numbers.
Paragraph 3, the first sentence. There is no explicit NT teaching to support this view. Otherwise, the watchtower would plaster them all over their literature. This is simply injecting preconcieved ideas into the text. Also, Witnesses clearly do not baptise in the name of the Father, the Son and holy spirit'. The 2 baptism questions testify to that.