I don't see this as a cop-out, though.
Read closer:
Note, though, that the fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy does not require an increase in the number or power of earthquakes....Distress is measured, not by the number of earthquakes or how they rate on the Richter sale, but by the effect that they have upon people.
Although they don't say it (or, indeed, directly imply it), this is the same way they phrase their other doctrinal shifts. EX: 'Oh, we never meant there would be MORE earthquakes, or they would be WORSE - that was just members running ahead of the org thinking that. We only really meant that the damage would be worse from them...'
Note that they NEVER make any mention of 'this publication has, in years past, implied that earthquakes would get worse, but we now know otherwise' or 'we misinterpreted the scriptures to mean....but now we have a clear understanding'.
NO. The problem with this article is twofold:
1) They act as if no doctrinal change has occured....'don't miss a beat' as it were
2) They then imply that those who think that earthquakes WERE a part of the sign were wrong (but never admitted that they ever thought so)
Xander F
(Unseen Apostate Directorate of North America - Ohio order)A fanatic is one who, upon losing sight of his goals, redoubles his efforts.
--George Santayana