this morning i happened to be browsing thru the "questions and answers" section of the watchman web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html
when i decided to follow a link to a certain page on the wtss web site.
Yadirf,Did the Magi view this phenomen as a star, or did they think that it was something else?
pseudo
Which part of my previous statement, as quoted below, was too difficult for your wee little mind to comprehend?
He simply produced a light ... a light that the Magi believed to be a "star".
.
this morning i happened to be browsing thru the "questions and answers" section of the watchman web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html
when i decided to follow a link to a certain page on the wtss web site.
no, yadirf believes satan created that particular star, .... -- dubla.
That's not exactly a true statement, dubla. I really don't see Satan as having "created" anything. I see him as having produced a phenomena. He simply produced a light ... a light that the Magi believed to be a "star". If inferior man can produce an artificial light (such as in the case of a simple flashlight) then should it come as any surprise that an angel such as Satan could accomplish the feat of making a light appear in some way ... a light that resembled a star?
.
this morning i happened to be browsing thru the "questions and answers" section of the watchman web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html
when i decided to follow a link to a certain page on the wtss web site.
When did Satan get control over the stars? He didn't create them. God did. (Gen. 1:16)
The "star" was NOT one of the celestial objects that God had created, O sleepy one. Unless you are first able to grasp that you may as well return to your slumber.
.
this morning i happened to be browsing thru the "questions and answers" section of the watchman web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html
when i decided to follow a link to a certain page on the wtss web site.
If the magi were led by Satan's star, as you allege, I would be interested to know who/what led the shepherds to baby Jesus?
See Luke 2:8-16.
.
this morning i happened to be browsing thru the "questions and answers" section of the watchman web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html
when i decided to follow a link to a certain page on the wtss web site.
This morning I happened to be browsing thru the "Questions and Answers" section of THE WATCHMAN web site
http://www.e-watchman.com/index.html when I decided to follow a link to a certain page on the WTSs web site. It took me to an article entitled "CHRISTMAS CUSTOMS--Are They Christian?"
As a result of having quickly scanned the article I was made to feel partly glad and partly sad. I was glad over the part that I could still agree with and can therefore still heartily support. But I was saddened over the part that I absolutely know to be in error and for that reason am no longer able to recommend to others.
TRUE, GLAD PART:
Had God wanted to guide [the Magi] to the young child, they would have been led to the exact place without needing to go first to Jerusalem and to Herod's palace.
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/12/15/article_01.htm
ERRONEOUS, SAD PART:
[Jesus] is the ruling King of God's Kingdom.
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/12/15/article_01.htm
Yes, its true that the Magi were initially being directed by Satan and that the Star of Bethlehem was his trick method for accomplishing it.
But, in spite of how much I would hope otherwise, its NOT true that Jesus is presently a "ruling King" since 1914.
Yadirf
.
my wife, liza, came home from work this morning (she was doing the 3rd shift thing) and said she was leaving me.
this afternoon at 1 pm i took her to the bus station.
at 4:20 pm she was off to nyc.
Where the heck are Yadirf, Fred Hall, and You Know to kick a guy when he's down.
Re: The double dog dare at the Kingdom Hall Nov 1, 2002 08:43
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.aspx?id=39745&site=3
Where Yeru had said: Too Funny! Somebody HAS to do the bit with the WatchTower embelm carved into it.
I don't know, Yeru, but it just may be that your attitude has come back around to bite you in the butt.
Friday
.
Edited by - Yadirf on 4 November 2002 13:11:4
he's a new mail man, at least around my neighborhood.
i used to see him with his family at the hall dressed all pretty in his suit.
i didn't think witlesses could be mail carriers, have gov.
your skill at seamlessly adding text to a graphic is awesome!
Honestly don't have much to brag about there, do I?
.
he's a new mail man, at least around my neighborhood.
i used to see him with his family at the hall dressed all pretty in his suit.
i didn't think witlesses could be mail carriers, have gov.
Geesh Yadirf! why'd you do that to poor Friday?
That there is "Nippy" there in the mail recepticle, Plmkrzy, not my puppy "Friday". But, believe you me, if my puppy ever were to do to my mailman what some of those mutts used to do to me then he can wind up in the same predicament as far as I care. LOL!
.
he's a new mail man, at least around my neighborhood.
i used to see him with his family at the hall dressed all pretty in his suit.
i didn't think witlesses could be mail carriers, have gov.
jesus was not born on december 25. that is not his birthday.
why is this day observed as jesus's birthday?
because some christians thought it was fine to mingle christianity with paganism.
UnDisfellowshipped,
So leave it alone will you. You are not the JUDGE.
Perhaps one day yet you will learn to heed your own advice!
.
