the blood prohibition
achtower of july 1, 1951, p. 414, in an extended "question from readers" column, argued strongly that jws must abstain from blood transfusions.
in light of the obvious fear of legal responsibility, the remark preceding the section is interesting: .
WOW! I was so excited to see you had posted part 03, and, once again, I wasn't disappointed.
To think that vaccines were made acceptable because it became a "virtually unavoidable practice"! I think pretty soon we'll see the same type of writing regarding blood transfusions. I bet many people died from not getting vaccinated as well.
this is a sign we should make up and hang on doors in our neighborhoods.. .
just a idea.
dragon
Wow - that's right to the brutal point!
scientific american has been very conservative about reporting progress.
on the anti-aging front.. that may change, however, with the new august issue discussing.
the testing of new chemicals which mimic caloric deprivation.. as the article explains, the best bet for extending the life of.
Dutchie - I'd love to know your routine. I'm pretty good, I don't eat fast food, desserts, etc. I try to keep the calories under 1500 a day. Physically I'm doing alright (thanks to the gym as well) but I'm still aging as fast as everyone else and sometimes I'm sooooooo tired. Am I missing something?
ironic words are found in a current article on the wts official site:
you probably cherish your right to believe whatever you wish to believe.
by exercising this right, earth's six billion inhabitants have produced an amazing diversity of beliefs.
Notice it says that many feared that the Jews and Freemasons would disrupt Christian civilization. But they didn't. So was there really a need for caution? Or should they have just appreciated the religious diversity as mentioned in the first paragraph?
It's pretty ironic that Christian civilization has disrupted other civilizations (native America, for example) - but that's ok according to them.
scientific american has been very conservative about reporting progress.
on the anti-aging front.. that may change, however, with the new august issue discussing.
the testing of new chemicals which mimic caloric deprivation.. as the article explains, the best bet for extending the life of.
I've actually read a study on this - it's modeled after some of the eating habits in ancient Tibet. In theory it will probably work, but I know of very few people who have that kind of willpower - especially with the accessibility of food everywhere.
have you ever had to deal with the thought that you really weren't that good of an example?
perhaps, the congregation was encouraged to pioneer or reach out for bethel service or go to seldom worked territory, etc.
and when you applied, you were told that you didn't qualify.
I tried and I tried, pioneering etc., even brought people in the truth (not too happy about that one now) - but, still I didn't quite fit the mold. Whenever they had a program on the platform highlighting the upstanding pioneers, etc., I was always at my seat.
and can the wt learn from other churches?.
the general conference of adventists held in toronto canada.
no adventist will ever be disfellowshiped again.. voted to change the term "disfellowshiped" to 'remeoved from membership".
Disfellowshipping and shunning - for those of us who are victims - is a horrid experience. How can a group that preaches love from a God that is supposedly love have a teaching that anyone who disagrees with them is not worthy of existance. In other words, they don't take you outside to stone you, but they'll destroy your self-worth instead.
lets shop!!!!!!!!!!
if you are going to spend a few extra days in ny and not touring boring buildings...hearing the same crap over and over then lets get together and do some classic worldly materialistic shopping!
the main place i want to go is centry 21 if anyone knows of some great outlet malls lets hit those also.
My husband and I will be coming down for the march. And I'm sure we'd both love to sneak away for some shopping. Also - I'm local if you need any help with anything.
subject: an important study.
a newly published study from the university of wisconsin.
showed that the kind of male face a woman finds attractive can differ.
LOL at Farkel - sad but true in many cases.
.
warning: do not read this if you are a fan of either george bush or michael jackson...hehehe... .
LOL - You're really on a roll today! This is hysterical - I nearly got in trouble at work.
