Gopher,
your above definitions seem to be fair. And I dont to nit pick here, but I probably am gunna.
I moreorless consider myself to be an atheist. Atleast thats what I told the mormons that came to my door the other day. I dont think there are any Gods of the traditional kind around, thats what I feel in my gut based on the evidence at hand. Though I do allow for the fact that they may exist (however unlikey), or that there may be a being/creature around in the great cosmos that could fit the definition of 'God'. Just show me the evidence and I'll believe, thats all I say. Until then, I cant.
And just to add to this. If you want to define 'God' as the 'unity of the cosmos', or as 'nature', or as something 'within' man/woman, then maybe I'm a theist?
so...
After having done a little more research here:
http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/intro.html#atheisms
It seems i am what is called a 'weak atheist', though not all the time.
Atheism is defined as:
'...an absence of belief in the existence of gods.'
to hold the above position would be enough to qualify you as a 'weak atheist'
Some atheists go to the point where they 'actively believe that particular gods, or all gods, do not exist'. This postion is called the 'strong atheist' postion. This would sum me in respect to Christianity.
So to put it all in a nutshell:
"Weak atheism" is simple scepticism; disbelief in the existence of God. "Strong atheism" is an explicitly held belief that God does not exist.
So says infidels.org
An agnostic can be defined as:
"someone who believes that we do not and cannot know for sure whether God exists."
I'll go so far as to agree that we "do not" know, atleast in certain cases, as to whether a certain God exists or not. But I dont agree that we "cannot know" whether a certain God exists, unless some evidence is provided that proves we cannot know.
An agnostic can also be defined as someone who:
believes that the evidence for or against God is inconclusive, and therefore is undecided about the issue.
I guess this could define me in a certain sense too.
So to sum up. I believe that some Gods do absolutely not exist, and I think the evidence bears this out. I think for others Gods, there is no evidence they exist, and therefore no reason to believe, though I allow for the fact they may exist while at the same time doubting it in the extreme. Other times I think that the evidence is inconclusive either way on the matter of Gods existence and I therefore remain undecided as to whether God exists or not. And still other times, depending on how you want to define the term 'GOD', I am a theist.
So maybe it could be said I am:
25% strong atheist
25% weak atheist
25% empirical agnostic
25% theist
It all depends on what day you catch me, and what religion we are talking about, I suppose. But I usually call myself an atheist.
I've never really made sense to begin with. I dont see why I should start now!