Also, but that's truly personnal, I don't think we need to believe in god to be a good person ... (you have them both sides, and to me most are) so can we focus only on the good (BE POSITIVE and PRO ACTIVE) instead of Focus on "hypothetical" GODs in knowing where it leads ??? what would A COHERENT AND LOVING GOD want ?
I don't deny that atheists or agnostics can be good people. I know this to be true. Just look at you!
BUT! This thread is about WHY people believe in God; as opposed to proving that God exists. Therefore, the lists of reasons including Dansk's testimonial, LittleToe's defense of Dansk, and me pointing out the inherent fallacy of "absolute proof" of God.
It has been my experience, and LIttleToe's experience, and Dansk's experience that the proof of God is ALWAYS truly personal. It makes sense (to me) that it is that way: That way those who truly don't need God don't have to deal with him. But I believe that he is always there when we do.
Calvin talked a lot, in his arrogant and pedantic way, about the Elect. How GOD does the choosing about when, where, and how to reveal himself to EACH individual. It makes a lot of sense to me, as a believer, as to how people can go through their lives and NEVER believe. They just weren't chosen. I disagree firmly about the notion of a fiery hell, but I think that life on earth can be hellish enough if we don't cling to SOMETHING - what if hell was just Earth without ANY good people and no way to die or escape?
And Jesus' parable of the shepherd who went to great lengths to rescue one sheep when he had 99 more tells me that God is going to do everything he can to save each and every individual. Which is a great relief to the believer: we are not responsible for saving anybody else, not even ourselves. God will tend to them in due time.
More than that, even if they went to Hell, it is standard Christian doctrine that Christ has the keys to that place, whatever and wherever it is: he has gone there to rescue people before, and could very well do it again... maybe in the fullness of eternity Hell will be empty completely as people slowly are redeemed, one by one.
But this is where I am coming from: I wanted to explain how the doctrine of the Elect could actually be a very humble and inclusive idea; while it sounds arrogant to say: God has shown himself to me and not to you, it makes better sense when I say that God has not shown himself to you YET. I also wanted to point out that the "truly personal" aspect of the proof of God is exactly what convinces believers so thoroughly. that is why I was curious if you even had an idea of what God's proof to you might be? You certainly don't have to tell me, and these proofs tend to sound silly even to fellow believers - but it seems that you already have an idea what I am talking about.
I'm sure we will have this conversation again (maybe in French someday!). Eternity is a long time, sweetie...
CZAR