Earnest,
I think that, with this kind of article, cleverly written, the WT ends up getting what they expect from the JWs without really telling them outright. The article has quite a few "double talk", examples of which I show below.
We cannot ignore Caesar?s law or the seriousness of an oath, but Jehovah?s law is supreme.
This is the "time to keep quiet." But when there is an attempt to conceal major sins, this may be the "time to speak."
My opinion is that by using expressions such as "we cannot ignore Ceasar's law", the WT puts a mantle of reasonableness and balance on them, which is what pleases a lot of people.
In the end, JWs get the message and will do as WT suggests, reporting someone for doing what they perceive as a violation of 'Jehovah's supreme law'.
Observador.