observador

Joined

• started 45 topics
• posted 1,020 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by observador

• 
  11

  JW"S Banned In Moscow Today!

  by Ranch in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  i was watching cnn and heard this announced.

  i also found this article at the following link.. http://www.iht.com/articles/525323.html

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  Hi Ranch.

  Thanks for the link to the article.

  Observador.
• 
  75

  I graduate tomorrow!!

  by Leolaia in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  with my phd!

  finally after all these long years.

  the funny thing tho is that i'm walking through the ceremony, but not getting my diploma... yet.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  Leolaia, I join the folks in congratulating you.

  I love your posts and hope you continue to share them with us, even after becoming a... doctor.

  Way to go!

  Observador.
• 
  13

  New 'Asleep', uh, I mean, 'Awake' information on b-days....

  by TallTexan in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was looking in one of the more recent copies of the awake and there is a question from the readers on pinatas.

  i won't go into the whole thing, but in the response, at one point, the awake says that (paraphrase) "the bible puts birthdays in a bad light.

  however (and i love that word, 'cuz it implies, 'well, we've changed our minds again') if a practice has no current false religious attachments, then it is up to each individual to decide what they will do".....that's not verbatim, but it's close enough.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  each Christian must make a personal decision as to whether he will follow such a custom.

  Very good points raised, but what I like the most is when they say "must make" a personal decision..., instead of the more natural and logical sentence "each Christian can/may make a personal decision..." since it involves a permission to do something.

  The reason I don't like "must make" is because it sounds like they're saying "hey, you're such grown up people. You have to make your own decisions now", as if it were the "christians" who created all these elaborated rules on what can and cannot be done and now want the WT to decide for them what to do.

  The same wording is used on the blood articles. Very clever, in my opinion.
• 
  13

  CANADA REFUSES TO CHANGE ITS NAME TO RONALD REAGAN

  by William Penwell in

  1. social
  2. humour

  canada refuses to change its name to ronald reagan, by andy borowitz

  canada today rebuffed a proposal made by republicans in congress to change its name to ronald reagan.. .

  the controversial proposal, which appeared to have broad backing from congressional republicans, was suggested as a way for canada to show its appreciation for the kindness and friendship that mr. reagan extended during his eight years as presidentbut moments after the proposal was floated, canadian prime minister paul martin gave the notion of renaming his country ronald reagan a frosty thumbs-down.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  very nice!
• 
  9

  Murmurings in my congregation

  by stichione in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just had a startling conversation with a brother in my congregation at today's meeting.

  he asked me if i had read the two study articles of the june 15th 2004 watchtower magazine on blood transfusions, particularly the banned and not-banned blood products.

  he told me he found it absolutely idiotic the way the argumentation for banning some blood products and not others was presented.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  The comparison is apparently to the symbolic value of Jesus? blood.

  I wrote short article in the form of a summary about these two articles specifically. You can find it here (in Portuguese, sorry). But the point I wanted to make was this: under "observações", my very first observation has exactly to do with the quote above.

  http://www.observandoomundo.com/artigo.php?cod=65

  I mean, the christian, when making use of a blood transfusion, has no intention of replacing the "blood of Christ". Why not? Simple: the blood of Christ theologically redeems a person from the adamic sin and death. A transfusion, on the other hand, cannot and will not replace that; it simply avoids a premature and needless death.

  The other points deal with WT language trickery to fool the unattentive "brothers".

  That's it.

  Observador.
• 
  58

  bank/credit-card accespoint in JW-convensionhall

  by Ozner in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  the 2 jw convension-halls in the netherlands have now a bank/credit-card accespoint to give contribution to the wts with your bank or creditcards.

  do you know this happens in other country's?

  it is really strange to see that brs&srs are giving donations with their visa & mastercards.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  Blondie,
  

  Badger, the WTS has been taking checks (and cashing checks) for some time now.

  you're right about the two points above. There is no significant differences between donating real cash, check or... credit card withdrawal. That's why I think that if Jesus would do anything, as some have wondered, he would've had reason to do it much earlier.

  What I hope, by the Soc doing this, is that it will become more clear for those who are already questioning things on the kingdom world, the true nature of this religion. The more they beg, the better.

  On the other point, you're right again. Just think about this: not much more than 70 years ago the organization would despise all religions. Now they not only welcome but even beg to be recognized and called a religion. That's why, folks, I think this organization will be around for a long long time, such is its ability to re-invent itself.

  When I find out anything about the conventions in Brazil, I'll let you all know.

  Observador.
• 
  17

  The Governing Body - Invisible and Impersonal

  by truthseeker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there used to be a time when one knew who the president of the watchtower society was, and with that in mind, one could sense some kind of leadership.

  perhaps witnesses then, felt that "the society" was keeping up with jehovah's celestial chariot.

  maybe you felt in the 80s and 90s that you had to keep "in step with jehovah's organization" because it was making bigger steps each year - and with each new release, maybe you felt "privileged" to be a part of the "spiritual paradise.".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  Hello Stradman.

  Thanks for sheding some light on this most elusive and mysterious group.

  Ohhh, and may I be the first to welcome you to the board!

  Observador.
• 
  19

  All of the JWs in Finland are "CUTE"

  by Quotes in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  first of all, shame on these brothers and sisters for not following the society's strict prohibition against private, non-official internet web pages.

  now, on a more funny note, check out the picture gallery: .

  http://www.sunpoint.net/~turkuenglish/salo_060702.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  And they still have the nerve to say that "Jehovah's people are so beautiful".

  http://www.sunpoint.net/~turkuenglish/t/tikkala/6.jpg

  Observador.
• 
  21

  In Case you care..... apostate words for Mum

  by ApagaLaLuz in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  my parents kicked me out of their home 3 years ago when i started to question things.

  i was engaged to a ministerial servant and a regular pioneer shortly before everything happened.

  although i haven't been da'd or df'd i have been labeled an "apostate.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  And I love you too, Chevy.

  Thanks for sharing the letter with us. I'm thinking of writing a letter to my parents in the same style as yours.
• 
  36

  RUSSIA: Sacked for being Jehovah's Witnesses

  by blondie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this article was published by f18news on: 4 may 2004russia: sacked for being jehovah's witnesses

  by geraldine fagan, moscow correspondent, forum 18 news service

  sergei popov and aleksandr takhteyev, two of three jehovah's witnesses sacked on 1 april by a private firm on the russian pacific island of sakhalin, claimed to forum 18 news service that there was a direct link between the decision to sack them and the ban on the jehovah's witnesses in the russian capital imposed by a moscow court several days earlier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  observador

  Earnest,

  I think that, with this kind of article, cleverly written, the WT ends up getting what they expect from the JWs without really telling them outright. The article has quite a few "double talk", examples of which I show below.

  We cannot ignore Caesar?s law or the seriousness of an oath, but Jehovah?s law is supreme.

  This is the "time to keep quiet." But when there is an attempt to conceal major sins, this may be the "time to speak."

  My opinion is that by using expressions such as "we cannot ignore Ceasar's law", the WT puts a mantle of reasonableness and balance on them, which is what pleases a lot of people.

  In the end, JWs get the message and will do as WT suggests, reporting someone for doing what they perceive as a violation of 'Jehovah's supreme law'.

  Observador.