Posts by AndDontCallMeShirley

6

Does anyone live by any Bible stuff?

by punkofnice in

this is not meant to be a slag off the bible thread.. i had a question asked me the other day and it was: 'do you live by anything from the bible?'.

i had to think about that one because i was force grown in the filthy, disgusting cult of the paedophile loving watchtower(r).. you know what?

i really don't know if i just naturally am a great bloke or if any 'nice' bits in the bible influenced me......or has western culture been influenced by the bible for good and bad?.

AndDontCallMeShirley

Yes, I live by the Bible's wonderful standards:

I treat my slaves well

I hate anyone who doesn't serve my god

I support genocide against all people but my own

I sold my daughter into slavery but got a very good price

I sacrifice an animal everyday, because god likes the smell of burning flesh

I don't touch the skin of a pig by playing football

I make sure all of my clothes have the correct fringe sewn on them (and I never mix two different kinds of fabric together- never!)

I never shave the hair around my temples

16

Transfusing blood is NOT eating blood

by Rufus T. Firefly in

jw
friends

watchtowers official view:.

you also ask why one can be disfellowshipped for taking a blood transfusion but not for taking blood fractions.

while both may affect the life of an individual, the expression "life-sustaining" in connection with blood transfusions is synonymous with the idea of taking in food for nourishment.

AndDontCallMeShirley

The Bible required that animals killed for food had to be bled , and the blood not eaten.

.

The Law did allow an Israelite to eat the unbled meat of an animal they found already dead (this means all the blood was still in the meat). And it allowed Israelites to sell unbled meat to Gentiles.

It goes back to the simple rule that when a life is taken the blood is poured out in acknowledgement of that life. In a blood transfusion, no donor has given their life, therefore, there's nothing to "give back" by pouring out the blood.

20

Convention visit observations

by Gorbatchov in

jw
friends

this weekend we visited the convention.

my findings:.

- no jw.org marketing here at this moment.

AndDontCallMeShirley

"The Bethel speaker told us that a new translation is not expected in our language".....No longer a Bible Society

Compared to other religions, WT has never been a Bible society. In fact, its original name was Watch Tower Tract Society, not Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.

WT is just going back to its roots.

29

FROM FEET TO FINGERS: THE WATCHTOWER EVOLVES INTO JW.ORG

by steve2 in

jw
friends

with the official letter from the gb to all bodies of elders, a stylized jw.org banner can now be appended to kingdom hall signage.. what an auspicious year this will turn out to be for the organization!!.

among other outcomes, the "link" with the old, baggage-ridden "watchtower bible & tract society" recedes into the background.

furthermore, now you don't pretend to need feet trudging door-to-door - your worker is done at the press of a few directed fingers.

AndDontCallMeShirley

will pdf downloads be counted as literature "placements"?

They already are. If a JW refers someone to JW.Org and that person downloads literature, the JW can count it as a "placement".

I'm sure it won't be long before a JW can post a Facebook page, and every "like" they get from a non-JW will be a "return visit".

XBE: The thing is, how many people always, and only rely on an official site of a company or organization for information about that entity?

I've talked to business owners who track their website use, and they say most people spend less than five minutes on the site and are only seeking basic information, like an address/directions or a phone number. They do not read the articles or other informational aspects of the business.

But what do you expect from WT? This is the same Organization that feeds JWs a Tic Tac...then calls it a "spiritual banquet". WT has never been big on substance, just appearance.

16

Transfusing blood is NOT eating blood

by Rufus T. Firefly in

jw
friends

watchtowers official view:.

you also ask why one can be disfellowshipped for taking a blood transfusion but not for taking blood fractions.

while both may affect the life of an individual, the expression "life-sustaining" in connection with blood transfusions is synonymous with the idea of taking in food for nourishment.

AndDontCallMeShirley

smiddy: They seem to completely ignore the fact that blood fractions are prosessed from stored blood donated by people

To add to WT's idiocy, it approves the use of someone else's stored blood for fractions but still bans a JW from storing their own blood for future use!!

Logically, wouldn't it be safer to you use your own blood for an upcoming surgery/procedure than someone else's? As is usual for WT, their absurd policies actually expose a JW to even more danger than they'd normally be subjected to had WT just stayed out of it.

6

JW Organization is occasionally spirit-guided! Here is the proof!

by exWTslave in

please follow the sequence of events connected with a bethel and see what you can conclude!.

1) when brach committee took a decision like a money-minded corporation, a conscientious bethelite (who is my close friend) wrote to the gb.. 2) gb took the bc into task, and directed bc to reverse its decision in that particular case.. 3) in time bc took revenge on the bethelite and removed his bethel-eldership on fabricated charges.. 4) gb withdraws the very arrangement of bethel eldership from all its branches!.

5) after one year, bc felt that their revenge was neutralized because of the unexpected withdrawal of bethel-eldership itself, again fabricated charges with the help of false witnesses and dismissed and disfellowshipped that bethelite.. 6) after two years the two bc members who orchestrated all the above events were sent out of bethel in great dishonor, virtually into wilderness ordinary publishers!.

AndDontCallMeShirley

WT is like any other corporate environment: sharks and piranhas can and do turn on each other quite frequently. It's the nature of the game- when you put a bunch of arrogant, self-serving a**holes in a group, large or small, and the water gets bloodied, there's a continual cycle of purgings, alliances and executions as each jockeys for position.

26

The JW.ORG craziness has begun....

by cultBgone in

jw
friends

i guess it was bound to happen..... just saw a facebook post where the user updated their profile picture to be the blue square jw.org logo.. .

don't know whether to laugh or cry.

worship the borg, you people!!!

AndDontCallMeShirley

And if they tattoo it on their butt, where it belongs, will the eldubs have to see it to approve it?

Only if it's on an Elder's ass....it will be inspected by the wannabe ministerial servant or new elder hopeful who's already down there kissing it.

26

The JW.ORG craziness has begun....

by cultBgone in

jw
friends

i guess it was bound to happen..... just saw a facebook post where the user updated their profile picture to be the blue square jw.org logo.. .

don't know whether to laugh or cry.

worship the borg, you people!!!

AndDontCallMeShirley

It probably won't be too long before WT makes one exception that allows tattoos- if a JW wants to get "JW.Org" tattooed on their forehead, WT will call it part of their 'sacred service'.

48

Today's "gay-bashing" and other embarrassing content public talk!

by stuckinarut2 in

oh wow..... the public talk today is certainly embarrassing for witnesses!.

started (completely left field too...seemed to come out of nowhere) with condemning homosexuality, and anyone who even tolerates it.

if you like tv shows or movies with gay characters, you are "just as bad" (eg modern family tv show).

AndDontCallMeShirley

This site makes so much more sense the the wt!

Mad magazine makes more sense than the WT.

Redhorse Woman: If those men were homosexuals, why would Lot even bother to offer his virgin daughters

Because apparently even flaming homosexuals cannot resist a woman who doinks her dad.

48

Today's "gay-bashing" and other embarrassing content public talk!

by stuckinarut2 in

oh wow..... the public talk today is certainly embarrassing for witnesses!.

started (completely left field too...seemed to come out of nowhere) with condemning homosexuality, and anyone who even tolerates it.

if you like tv shows or movies with gay characters, you are "just as bad" (eg modern family tv show).

AndDontCallMeShirley

Used the comparison of the way that a violent person can change their violent ways using biblical principles, so too can a "homosexual" person change their ways using biblical principles...

.

LOL

"Out of convicted rapists, 57% admitted to reading pornography. 95% admitted to reading the Bible."