heathen: I would be happy that they supported non compliance during viet nam tho . that would be the silver lining for me
ADCMS: Remaining neutral to war or being a "conscientious objector" is not the issue with Terry's situation or the WT quotes I provided.
The point is the Watchtower Society denied Jehovah's Witnesses the right to accept "alternative service" options that the government established precisely for the purpose of accomodating conscientious objectors. In fact, most governments bend over backwards to accomodate conscientious objectors, and JWs tend to get cut more slack than other religions. So, in order to avoid going to prison, the government would allow a JW to work in a hospital, do community service, work on a road crew, etc. However, the WT, in its incomprehensible reasoning, denied this option to JW men, equating working in a hospital as equivilent to serving in the armed forces and engaging in combat. If a JW accepted the alternative service option, rather than go into the military or to prison, they would be disfellowshipped for compromising their "Christian neutrality".
The fact that the WT reversed their policy, as I provided evidence for, shows that the policy had no real basis in the first place. It was simply a man-made rule that resulted in innocent JWs paying a heavy price. And, that is Terry's point. Rather than allow each JW to make a personal decision in this matter according to their conscience, the WT not only demanded compliance with their policy but coached JWs to make claims to the draft board that were untrue and absolved the WT of all culpability in the process.
Incidentally, Jehovah's Witnesses are not the only religion that have an official policy of remaining neutral to wars, then or now. So, I'm not sure how the idea of a"silver lining" factors into your comment. Are you saying that because the WT did not support the Vietnam War it somehow gets them off the hook for all the other injustices and nonsense they commit? And, that Terry's experience has no merit? Really?
Also, the WT did not always hve a policy of neutrality to military service. In fact, in Russell's time an IBSA (JW) could even serve in combat. After Russell:
In a further attempt to appease their enemies, Rutherford published statements in The Watchtower urging Bible Students to buy war bonds, participate in a day of prayer for allied victory and only stopped short of encouraging armed service. The Proclaimers book says:
"Although they endeavored to do what they felt was pleasing to God, their position was not always one of strict neutrality … Thus, in accord with a proclamation of the President of the United States, The Watch Tower urged the Bible Students to join in observing May 30, 1918, as a day of prayer and supplication in connection with the outcome of the world war. [The Watch Tower, June 1, 1918, p. 174]" (p. 191)
*** w80 11/15 pp. 26-27 par. 17 "Jehovah of Armies" to the Rescue! ***
17 Like the Israelites of Isaiah’s day, the spiritual Israelites sold themselves because of wrong practices and came into bondage to the world empire of false religion, that is to say, to Babylon the Great, and to her worldly paramours. (2 Ki. 17:17; 1 Ki. 21:20, 25) An outstanding instance of this occurred during World War I of 1914-1918