I have read “history of Ideas and science” on an University level. And one of the understandings I found was that most of Bible content only is a repeating of older stories, sometimes distorted from old tales and explanations. Many of these stories has been found in cuneiform letters from the ancient Sumers. Even since we have been able to understand old Egyptian hieroglyphs (thanks to Champillion), we have been able to document our history down to 5400 years bc. This documentation is not a translation of old paper rolls that has been translated, transformed. Written again, translated, destroyed, reformed over and over…..
They are actually written in original letters on stone……
An idea of what makes the “wholly Bible” fallacy obvious, are the s.c. Parallel scriptures. The books of Chronicles, Kings, the books of Samuel and others are practically copies. You will find that many of the different chapters are identical. Sometimes they makes mistakes and mention another name than in the in the previous. If these books are run in a computer, you can immediately se the similarities, thus if you were using them in un University essay your examination will fail. You would probably be accused of fraud. And suspended from the university. Why is this obvious not holly scriptures, why do they repeat themselves on and on again.
The obvious reasons are they were not written by god inspired men. They were written by copying men who were looking on older rolls. And these older rolls where not the only rolls, there were 100 of rolls with similar texts. The copyist did not understand that other versions of the text were stored in other synagogues. When Athanasius of Alexandria compiled the books of the bible, he could not see these obvious mistakes.
If you would like to se more literature and Bible criticism, I would recommend as a starter SAB.
or http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/
Here you can see lots of commentary’s to Bible texts. God luck in your studies…
Bugbear