Hidden-Window,
Thanks for this post. These words of yours are the great tragedy of the ORG:
there is no freedom of speech within the organization … honesty is not possible while you are inside.
Perhaps this is why only incompetent men reach out.
i have noticed an apparently increasing number of men who are not interested in becoming ministerial servants or elders.
i also know of some that have voluntarily stepped down (which is my case) for no obvious solid reason.. i remember, during my teenage years or even during my twenties, the brothers were always looking forward to being appointed... although many still do, i have noticed there are many others with whom you do not know what the deal is.. since there is no freedom of speech within the organization, we remain in the dark about the motives and desires of everybody else.
i attend a congregation with only two ministerial servants, while it is full of men who do not seem to be willing to do more.. it is hard to tell exactly what is going on, since honesty is not possible while you are inside, but i am starting to think that more and more are becoming disillusioned.... .
Hidden-Window,
Thanks for this post. These words of yours are the great tragedy of the ORG:
there is no freedom of speech within the organization … honesty is not possible while you are inside.
Perhaps this is why only incompetent men reach out.
my parents and i are discussing a quote that was made many years ago.
we know for a fact that it was made.
i have exhausted all of my resources to find it, and so i come here to this fine group to ask you about this quote.. the subject is about money.
http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=2025979&doc_no=a136641.
12/19/2014order filed.
upon due consideration, the media request of applicant abc news to make a video recording of oral argument in the above-referenced appeal is granted.
Excuse my ignorance of legal matters, but if someone knowledgeable would kindly confirm my take on this, I'd appreciate it. Does this
Good cause appearing, oral argument in this matter is continued to Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
mean that as things stand, this oral agument will take place on Jan. 14th? Or does the "continued" mean it might be delayed?
Also is anyone here going to be present at this argument? There's nothing like a live report.
part 1. .
she was suspecting me that i'm no longer interested in the borg, and she was trying to get a confession.
this is how our conversation went out.
Dark Angle,
So what happened to Mario? Was he DFed for disagreeing with the ORG? Or was he declared "disassciated" or what? No ordinary person can stand up the ORG that way and just be ignored...
while there are not too many currently defending the watchtower in this discussion forum, it happens from time to time.
and quite often, there may be new people and lurkers reading these discussions.
i just wanted you to ponder these questions.
Committeechairman: thanks for your recent posts. I always look forward to them. This statement is certainly spot on:
There are signs that the Governing Body might be leaning toward much tigher control.
Looking forward to more info from you!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwffgrqgemc.
Yes the quality is very poor. A shame.
i was asked recently by a still in friend (it was meant sincerely not sarcastically).
"but what do you do with that scripture so far as not attending meetings?".
i typed hebrews 10:25 in to the search bar but didnt get much.. .
Of course, different people's situations are different, but you're still able to go (not DFed/DAed) and if you can stomach it, you could always pop into a meeting once in a while and then say, "See, I'm not FORESAKING them. I'm just irregular. Heb. 10 is about those foresaking the meetings."
Just a thought if it helps you deal with friends/famly still in, like many members here have.
i have a family member that will not believe that the jws put a dinosaur in the front cover of thier bible.
i am looking for a copy that has that map inside front cover with the raptor.
if anyone has one they can sell let me know.
I forgot about that! Thanks for the reminder. I think I must have wondered about that when I was young. I remember that it struck me as odd.
listed as watchtower attorneys practicing in new york: attorneys at 100 watchtower drive in patterson, ny 12563:.
philip brumley (home address 131 brimstone road,[ seriously ?
] patterson ny 12563 although also given for him in another document was 2891 route 22, patterson, ny 12563-2236; new york attorney registry: 2224871);.
Does anyone else find it odd that there are females on this list? So is this legal area one in which the Org makes an exception to the role of sisters? Anyone know the story here?
i found this, and did not see it posted previously.. thought i'd post it, in case it's of use to anyone.. http://irs990.charityblossom.org/990t/200908/111753577.pdf.
according to this all assets in 2008 were valued at $400,000,000.
.
Thanks. Whatever any shortcomings, this is quite a find!