My Lodge cast iron skillets, naturally non-stick.
I can make beautiful pan-seared just about anything: fish, steak, you name it!
Even scrambled eggs turn out wonderfully and you don't have to worry about all the toxic crap from teflon.
My Lodge cast iron skillets, naturally non-stick.
I can make beautiful pan-seared just about anything: fish, steak, you name it!
Even scrambled eggs turn out wonderfully and you don't have to worry about all the toxic crap from teflon.
today i added a new article to my blog.
the information is a little dated.
material cited was published in 1973. but i don't find any good sources online for this information so i published it myself.. the doctor involved (now deceased) was dr. j lowell dixon.
Thanks Marvin!
well, i have been lurking on this site for several months and i recently decided to join as a member.
i have made several observations and would like to make a few comments.. first, i am perplexed by the attitude of many on this site that are either former or active (but apostate) jws.
they seem to have a strong hatred for the wts and also for rank and file jws.
▪ Why have Jehovah’s Witnesses disfellowshipped (excommunicated) for apostasy some who still profess belief in God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ?
"Obviously, a basis for approved fellowship with Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot rest merely on a belief in God, in the Bible, in Jesus Christ, and so forth. The Roman Catholic pope, as well as the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, professes such beliefs, yet their church memberships are exclusive of each other. Likewise, simply professing to have such beliefs would not authorize one to be known as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Approved association with Jehovah’s Witnesses requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses." - Watchtower, April 1, 1986, Questions from Readers.
Notice that accepting the Bible is not enough, one must also accept those "beliefs that are unique to Jehovah's Witnesses" no matter how often they change.
well, i have been lurking on this site for several months and i recently decided to join as a member.
i have made several observations and would like to make a few comments.. first, i am perplexed by the attitude of many on this site that are either former or active (but apostate) jws.
they seem to have a strong hatred for the wts and also for rank and file jws.
Welcome Heisenberg!
if a personal God does exist, a caring and loving God, then JWs do have ‘the truth’ regardless of all the false prophecies and issues they have with changing doctrine.
Your conclusion does not follow from your premise.
One could just as easily say:
That being said, you ask quite a lot of questions, none of them necessarily mutually exclusive, but you ask them as if they are.
Don't forget your uncertainty principle!
during one of those meetings that took place before my jc, one of the elders, who was a good friend of mine back then and used to come up with a few outlandish personal views about some teachings, attempted to counter one of my arguments like this:.
eden - "well, if the truth doesn't change, why is it that what we teach as 'truth' has changed over the years (several examples given)?
how can we dogmatically claim at any given moment that we have 'the truth' if our teachings keep changing?".
"Though mistaken, they eagerly shared it with others." (Proclaimers, chap. 28, p.623)
Funny, I distinctly remember the illustration in the old Live Forever book about a person that was reading a map incorrectly with the point being that being sincere in your beliefs, but wrong does not make you right.
Hypocrites.
i was going through old email and i came across the below email from a former acquaintance of mine who is a jw.
when we were both jw's, we were both pretty liberal in our beliefs.
its quite interesting how cognitive dissonance kicks in, for many & not too much for others.
Or if you have some issue with the understanding of that scripture any reasonable person would agree that leadership is needed in an organization. I am happy to have the guidance from the governing body.
Leadership and guidance are far different from demanding unquestioning obedience.
This person is very confused.
We don't allow people to start sects within our organization or change things as they see fit. makes sense to me
Who is "we"? He just said that he is "happy to have the 'guidance' from the governing body."
I guess he doesn't know the history of this organization. Rutherford caused a schism back in the early 1900's and started his own sect.
This person is very confused.
Asking questions is fine .... What changes that is when you take ideas ... from someones mind thats not your own and spread those to others.
How does he not see that he is taking ideas from "someones [sic] mind that is not his own and spreading them to others.
This person is very, very confused.
If someone wants to leave our organization we don't disfellowship them. ... We love you as our friend and won't shun you just because your as we put it "spiritually week".
Well that's just not true. Some people can fade without repercussions, but not many. The number of ex- and technically current-JWs that are shunned simply for walking away without being DF'd is extremely large as probably most posters on this forum can attest.
You are not the one we follow and have no organization with any rich spiritual history.
Um, aren't we supposed to follow Christ and not men?
Have I pointed out that this person is confused.
If you do what Russell did and start something that makes Jah use you as his channel than I will listen and follow what you say.
Ok, so now he completely contradicts almost everything he has previously said. Also, how would he know if some contemporary person were to start something like Russell that makes Jah use him? How would he know since he refuses to listen to anything that disagrees even slightly with the GB, except of course when the GB disagree with the previous GB or themselves, as in last week's, last month's or last year's "old light"?
This person is extremely confused and clearly does not know how to think.
i was going through old email and i came across the below email from a former acquaintance of mine who is a jw.
when we were both jw's, we were both pretty liberal in our beliefs.
its quite interesting how cognitive dissonance kicks in, for many & not too much for others.
ADCMS: JWs prefer wishful thinking over evidence.
I would phrase it a bit differently: JW's prefer wishful thinking over critical thinking.
the time has nearly come to switch over to the new forum software.
of course it's not completely finished yet (and never will be) but i think it's good enough to go live with and probably already better than the current one.
i'll give you a quick overview of what to expect and post more detail about the changeover process later.. cloud platform.
Yeah!
So when's it coming? "Soon .... !"
good read.... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/burke-e-strunsky/the-treacherous-intersect_b_6357906.html.
.
.
PTN Nailed it!
Thanks for sharing
during one of those meetings that took place before my jc, one of the elders, who was a good friend of mine back then and used to come up with a few outlandish personal views about some teachings, attempted to counter one of my arguments like this:.
eden - "well, if the truth doesn't change, why is it that what we teach as 'truth' has changed over the years (several examples given)?
how can we dogmatically claim at any given moment that we have 'the truth' if our teachings keep changing?".
I'm curious, because that was an angle I had never heard before, albeit clearly skewed. If you had enough time to prepare a counter-argument, what would it be like?
I would simply blink my eyes, smile and say, "You're scaring me!"