UTR: For the record, I thought I was endorsing your point about the Society's foolishness in citing him as an "authority." Not only is he a well-known ex-JW and apostate, he's also a fruit loop, as far as I'm concerned.
That's what I thought. Again, I just wanted clarity.
Everyone's point about Bergman's "qualifications" being questionable only emphasize the strangeness of the WTBTS using him as a source!
They're really scraping the bottom of the barrel if they have to use apostates with iffy credentials to "validate" their "science articles."
Let's review: It's a cult!