Night Owl: If you don't get it, you just don't want to get it.
I take back what I said before. Now I think you ARE my ex-wife!
Night Owl: If you don't get it, you just don't want to get it.
I take back what I said before. Now I think you ARE my ex-wife!
NO, typical response.
Don't answer legitimate questions, just throw a little tantrum and act as if everyone else is the problem.
You remind me of me ex-wife.
NightOwl (aka NO): "What we have all done is just exchange one type of mind control, one form of slavery, for another."
Nonsense! Just nonsense.
Night Owl, who or what moved you to ask the question?
have a look at this new subliminal image from the mag of .
spam link removed.
.
It's called pareidolioa.
The WTBTS has enough legitimate things to criticize without seeing things that aren't there.
so i finally read tony's life story and this one point really hit me where he was talking about his son's.
on page 7 he say's "because they made the truth their own, they make susan and me look good.
so those who children leave the "truth" look bad?.
Anthony Morris is a narcissistic, delusional sociopath.
Don't worry about anything he says.
i was in conversation a few weeks back with a jw i have known for at least four decades.
most of it was catching up on family stuff, he has loads of kids, some have married and produced sprogs since i left.
all news to me.. i demolished a couple of his fatuous arguments, and then he decided to scuttle away, throwing this over his shoulder as he went :.
"Wait a second. YOU don't know what the words 'generation' or 'soon' mean, but you think I need to get my head right!?!"
Let's review: It's a cult!
i learned this past week that my wife is now awake.
i just shared the pbs newshour segment with her with no comment other than something along the lines of, "jw story on pbs.".
she is furious at the arrogance of these men.. thats what happens when you get a momma angry!.
Wow, congrats to both of you.
You two have some important decisions to make.
Welcome to the rest of your life!
it is often said that our retinas are are an example of sub-optimal design.. a few years ago i was intrigued by a passing comment in one of nick lane's to the effect that this is not a good argument but he didn't go into much detail.. researchers at leipzig have revealed the role of glial cells in transmitting light from the surface of the retina to the cones, acting like fiber-optic cables.. erex ribak has built a model of the eye and demonstrated some fascinating details.... so, the question is - does this reflect good "design" or a retro-fitted repair like the hubble telescope's glasses?.
Morpheus: it isnt a design flaw that causes radiator leaks but normal wear and tear since rubber hoses dont self repair like our bodies.
My point.
The same thing with blood vessels that occasionally rupture (minus the sometimes self-repair part).
The fact that things--even biological things--break down is not evidence of "flaws" by design or otherwise.
it is often said that our retinas are are an example of sub-optimal design.. a few years ago i was intrigued by a passing comment in one of nick lane's to the effect that this is not a good argument but he didn't go into much detail.. researchers at leipzig have revealed the role of glial cells in transmitting light from the surface of the retina to the cones, acting like fiber-optic cables.. erex ribak has built a model of the eye and demonstrated some fascinating details.... so, the question is - does this reflect good "design" or a retro-fitted repair like the hubble telescope's glasses?.
Cantleave, I am familiar with the terminology you used. I think it is a poor one and find that many biologists avoid its use as it is often misleading.
Nevertheless, I was seeking clarification because the thrust of your post was unclear.
No need to be an insulting twit about it.