Oh, beautiful pool! It doesn't add any value to your real estate to add a pool here, so the thousands of dollars would be a waste, but, dang, I would love a pool in my backyard!
I have a photo of my home with my windowboxes overflowing with petunias on my cellphone from the end of last summer, but I can't figure out how to post it on my tablet. Oh well.
Lovely! A great place to hide away and read a book!
A few more weeks and hopefully it will be warm enough to start working in the garden here.
today a main point in the wt was a guess game.. the study elder asked: .
what's wrong on the picture?.
before i share the local conclusions here, i would like to hear the comments made in your congregation 😎.
Ah, thank you!
today a main point in the wt was a guess game.. the study elder asked: .
what's wrong on the picture?.
before i share the local conclusions here, i would like to hear the comments made in your congregation 😎.
What was the context of this picture? Was the study about dressing appropriately or did the conductor just pull that question out of his ass?
Oh, yes, Gorbatchov, surely members of a motor club wear suits, don't they?
Truly, this illicit showing of ankles covered in socks must stop! But, more importantly, where is the counsel for the sisters, who not only show their ankles, but they are entirely visible through pantyhose?!?!
they're known as marmite cars in the uk.
you either love them or hate them.
i love mine.. what do you think?.
The above is the (long) link to the hamster advertisement. Sorry, need to figure out how to post a click-on youtube video.
Yeah, if we'd had a 274 hp option, I might have definitely given more consideration to the car.
Snugglebunny, I really like the car. The seats: is that leather or vinyl? In any case, it looks good!
they're known as marmite cars in the uk.
you either love them or hate them.
i love mine.. what do you think?.
they're known as marmite cars in the uk.
you either love them or hate them.
i love mine.. what do you think?.
The engine options in the US are 1.6 liter inline 4 at 130 hp, or 1.6 liter turbo at 200 hp. There's also a 2.0 liter inline four at 170 hp. All seem to get the same fuel efficiency: about 30 miles per gallon.
I just bought a new car last November, so I considered this one. The 130 hp is waaay underpowered, and by the time you add the turbo to get the power you need, you're at about $24K.
I ended up going with a subaru WRX in a 2.0 liter turbo with 267 horsepower and paid about $26K. Still get about 30 miles per gallon.
But, I really like the looks of the Kia Soul. We call it the Hamster Car due to an advertisement that had human-sized hamsters driving the car, jamming out to the stereo. If I could find it, I'd post it.
they're known as marmite cars in the uk.
you either love them or hate them.
i love mine.. what do you think?.
Is this the Kia Soul in the US?
mathematically measuring evolution.. when judging relationships in terms of morphological characteristics we will always be bound by the subjective.
morphologically one cannot exactly measure the distance between two organisms strictly in mathematical terms.
using the standard method of taxonomy we cannot quantify the difference between a horse and a mouse, or know which is closer mouse to cat, or mouse to fish.
'Jesus verified everything he said was truth by means of his resurrection, including his statement that the Old testament was true.' -towerwatchman
And therein lies the problem. This was listed as your main argument.
And from that circular reasoning you go searching for "scientific" evidence to prove that founding assumption.
And after finding one piece of evidence that seems compelling to you, you ignore the many other lines of evidence in proof of evolution, even going so far as to chasten posters who point these out as 'not addressin the OP."
For your sake, I really hope you are a troll, because otherwise your ability to reason through a subject leaves much to be desired and leaves you open to any kind of propaganda.
Spock out.
mathematically measuring evolution.. when judging relationships in terms of morphological characteristics we will always be bound by the subjective.
morphologically one cannot exactly measure the distance between two organisms strictly in mathematical terms.
using the standard method of taxonomy we cannot quantify the difference between a horse and a mouse, or know which is closer mouse to cat, or mouse to fish.
Who is this "evolutionist" you are referring to?
If you are talking about more than one, you need to add an "s" to the end to make it plural: "evolutionists."
Sorry for the derail; third grade teacher here.
