committeechairman

Joined

• started 6 topics
• posted 137 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by committeechairman

• 
  10

  SERVING ELDERS - WHY THE NEW DONATION ARRANGEMENT?

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  in case you didn't notice the false reason given to you, i've highlighted the 15 times you were told directly, and the 3 times indirectly in the letter from the g.b.!.

  so why didn't you reason on the addendum you were given by the org to read out to your congs, which "legalised" this deceptive money-grab from those whom you are supposed to be protecting?

  shame on every last one of you for not explaining what was really going to happen to the donations!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  This is a matter of trust. Most of Jehovah's Witnesses and elders trust the Governing Body when they say that they want to balance worldwide and want to take control of construction to expedite in areas that really need it. An, indeed, at first glance, most bodies of elders were not following previous direction received that told them to hold off requests for remodels and new KHs where this wasn't absolutely necessary. So, funds weren't available (even in the US) where they were needed.

  Remember that most elders are also not aware of many of the issues exposed on this board and others. They loyally follow direction and don't read sites like this and so have no reason to doubt that when the GB says they will use the funds wisely if the donations go to general funds. Others of us are more skeptical.

  In any case, something interesting is developing. In talking to several elders I know across the US, the publishers are not really turning in the anonymous slips that they are supposed to for the congregation to determine what to commit to in a resolution. I think this is fascinating. I'm also not sure of the reason - and neither are they. Is it that the directions were so complicated everyone just said "HUH?" and went on with their lives? Or is that publishers have finally had enough of this crap and just aren't going to commit again? Time will tell.

  CC
• 
  16

  Who Will the Circuit Overseers "Report" to Now???

  by RubaDub in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i still do not understand the new structure at this point.. there has to be something between thousands of co's and the gb.

  i know there were zone overseers that the do's reported to.. i have spoken to a couple of elders i can talk to frankly and they both said they have no idea.. rub a dub.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  Specifically, the circuit overseers have always directly interfaced with the Service Department and a specific desk at the branch. For instance, in the United States each desk covers one or more states, such as the Texas desk or the Florida desk. Some states have two as I understand it. So I would imagine that the arrangement wouldn't change. The district overseers basically were overseeing Circuit Assemblies, doing workweeks with the circuit overseers (typically the week following a Circuit Assembly) and doing PQRs (Personnel Qualification Reports - a kind of Annual Performance Appraisal) on the circuit overseer and his wife (if married). Also, they had some oversight responsibility for the Regional Building Committees (which are also going away).

  I think (not sure) that the review/workweek function might be filled by "branch representatives" that just travel out from the branch. I doubt very seriously that the Governing Body will allow circuit overseers to float free without any kind of review. It may not be apparent but the more responsibility you have in the organization the more control you have to endure. You go from "high control" to "ultimate control". Things that you previously could not be counseled for sudden become fair game - you along with your family. It is hard to describe but if you understand how mid and upper echelon people functioned in the old USSR/Soviet Union then you have a fair idea of how it works in the mid to upper levels of the organization. Only in this case it is labeled "unity" and "loyalty". Better toe the party line or you'll find yourself discarded socially or worse removed/deleted and shunned - disfellowshipped without being disfellowshipped. I've seen it happen many times and I've watched it break men better than me.

  CC
• 
  44

  New Financial Arrangements

  by Joe Grundy in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  dear friends.

  i never was a dub.

  i am not a qualified lawyer or accountant.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  As I understand non-profit accounting SOP and IRS tax regulations, the pledges (if the branch office is notified of them - I'll have to re-read the letter) would consitute "income" and would have to be treated as such at the time the pledge is made. If the congregation fails to live up to the pledge, those amounts must be written off in a manner similar to bad debt. If the pledges are NOT reported officially to the branch office, as I understand it no income would be recorded except for actual contributions being transmitted/sent in.

  As for the loans, previously they would have had to be carried on the books as loans receivable assets. If the loans were forgiven, then the receivable balances would have been written off as allowances, contributions (most likely), or bad debts (which they really aren't - this is the result of a policy change). Once these assets are gone off the books, this would relieve the organization of some kinds of jurisdictional property tax reporting requirements (which they probably do not owe taxes on but are required to report nonetheless).

  So, just thinking out loud, it kind of looks like the organization just cut down the size of their tax/income/regulatory radar signature to something much less detectable. I wonder if that's the overarching strategy at play here. For sure there must be an angle. What it is will become clear very soon, I think.

  CC
• 
  38

  Two points of entry for the Dallas Convention?

  by CaptainSchmideo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  anyone else hear about this?

  i got this second hand from my wife, who got it from her mom.. .

  apparently, there will be two points of entry to the convention.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  Contacted a friend of mine in that area who is involved with convention administration and he said that all of the entrances will be handled the same way...no lapel card required but a Homeland Security bag search and wanding is required.
• 
  41

  Could you get disfellowshipped for simply asking questions?

  by LogCon in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  if so, what would be some examples?.

  .

  only questions that show a higher degree of thought and intelligence please..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  I agree with BluesBrother. I think with the right elders on a body in the right congregation (not referring to right as "correct" but as the ones who would react in the way I'm going to describe) they could view questions that clearly were designed to make other think carefully about what they believe as apostate teaching. I could see them counseling a publisher about asking others these kinds of questions (even if the publisher had been speaking to elders) to cease and desist, using Galatians 6:1 (" Brothers, even if a man takes a false step before he is aware of it, you who have spiritual qualifications try to readjust such a man in a spirit of mildness. But keep an eye on yourself,for fear you too may be tempted.") Then, if the publisher didn't stop, they might disfellowship on grounds of either "brazen conduct" or straight-up apostasy. If they choose to disfellowship for apostasy, that carries such a connotation with it that it would be unlikely to win an appeal, get the branch office to reverse, or even get reinstated, because a disfellowshipping for apostasy (note that this is different from disassocation voluntarily) carries in the minds of all elders who handle the matter later that the accused is deceptive, manipulative, and basically like Satan - looking to destroy individuals and the organization.

  Not sure if those comments help but just wanted to provide some insider/elder observations from real-life experience.
• 
  45

  After leaving did the feeling go away?

  by committeechairman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the feeling that you're never good enough.

  the feeling that you're wicked and evil.. .

  because i'd give anything not to feel this way.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  The feeling that you're never good enough. The feeling that you're wicked and evil.

  Because I'd give anything not to feel this way.
• 
  21

  BOE april 25

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does someone have the boe april 25 letter about the transfer of the local ownership of all kingdom halls to the society?.

  it seems a mayor financial transaction, allthough here in the netherlands.. gorby.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  Found the letter I was thinking of - it was dated 3/26 and called "Use of Congregation Property" and just saw it on Saturday morning - sure it was posted either that day or the day before because I watch the site really, really closely.

  I'll grab the language and post it. I don't see any language that implies transfer of ownership to the branch office but you can judge for yourself.

  CC
• 
  21

  BOE april 25

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does someone have the boe april 25 letter about the transfer of the local ownership of all kingdom halls to the society?.

  it seems a mayor financial transaction, allthough here in the netherlands.. gorby.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  Something wierd is going on. I saw a letter on Saturday that talked about KH renting space to other entities and people not in special full time service, and it probably would have been dated April 25. However, now I can't find it at all. This is under the US branch.

  I'll check and see if I downloaded a copy somewhere. Very strange.
• 
  43

  New Atlanta Assembly Hall Has raised 3.4 million Dollars... GONE

  by James Jackson in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  they announced last week that the new atanta assembly hall has thus far raised 3.4 million dollars.

  my local told that will become the society's come may 1. i wonder how that will go over with the ones who have been contributing to this fund..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  The letter directs bodies of elders to remit all of this to the Worldwide work and not hold it locally. You better believe that a combination or RBC/LDC, CO, and branch office staff will be on congregations like crazy to conform. The same thing happened a few years ago when the congregations were told to put their excess funds "on deposit" with the branch office. RBCs and COs enforced this "suggestion "vigorously" and congregations finally complied.
• 
  21

  BOE april 25

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does someone have the boe april 25 letter about the transfer of the local ownership of all kingdom halls to the society?.

  it seems a mayor financial transaction, allthough here in the netherlands.. gorby.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  committeechairman

  I do not see an April 25th letter in the congregation domain / elders area. What was the subject/RE line on the letter?

  Chance