Junction-Guy

Joined

• started 310 topics
• posted 5,790 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Junction-Guy

• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  you are right DJS, my kind is fading fast. But the bible teaches this too, so I believe you there. Whether you want to or not, you are proving the bible to be true. There will come a time when very few people will hold fast to the word of God. In the end times good will be called bad, and bad will be called good. for if the days are not cut short, even the very elect could be deceived. We are living, surely living, in the days he spoke about!
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  And so are left wing liberals!
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  Viviane, that is not idiotic at all, that is just what happened! We left a country where the King and the royal family had the power concentrated in their hands, and came here to America, where we the people (majority rules) could decide our destiny as a nation. Power was no longer in the hands of a few, but was placed in the hands of the many.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  SecretSlaveClass---which goes to show it was an invalid ruling, called into question by the fact that 2 of those justice were not impartial at all, but had been involved with gay marriage personally.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  No, I am right. Anyway, if 2 of those justices had recused themselves from the ruling, as they should have since they had performed gay marriages themselves, then this ruling would have went the other way.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  Sir82, that is the opposite of what this movement says--this movement is not about majority rules and will gladly tell you so. They will tell you that "majority rules" does not exist. Our forefathers left a "minority rules" type of government to come here so the majority could rule. They came here so "we the people" could determine our own destiny as a nation instead of having power concentrated in the hands of a few.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  I am not happy when I see democratic principles thwarted. I voted against gay marriage 8 years ago, and would gladly vote against it again. I see this whole movement as one big cult, bent on destroying traditional values and free speech in this nation. I have seen them twist the bible in the very same way the Watchtower does, I have seen them try to silence dissent, in the very same way the Watchower does. I have seen them do an end run around the political process by whoring off the judicial system, in the same way the Watchtower does. It would be hypocritical of me to lambast the Watchtower society, and then turn around and embrace this movement, for it stands against everything I hold dear--freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc etc.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  So it basically boils down to numbers--more justices ruled for gay marriage than against. Had it been the other way around, then gay marriage would have lost. I guess the majority rules in this instance.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  funny though, if the Supreme Court interpreted the constitution differently and ruled against gay marriage, people would be crying, "this is a democracy, this can't happen" etc etc. They want to use democracy when it is convenient for their agenda, and when it isn't they just defer it to the judicial branch--it is an end run around the will of the people, placing power in the hands of a few. Our forefathers would be horrified if they could see how our government has gone.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Junction-Guy

  You're absolutely right! This whole movement reminds me so much of the Watchtower, the similarities are uncanny.