No, vienne, we are not interested in these research expeditions to persuade us over into your apotheosis of a false prophet.
What was stated against him is drawn from his own self-damning recorded testimony in a court of law, under oath. Fact check complete. We need nothing more.
Even if your flattery of the man was valid, and it is not, it only further implicates him as an bizarre shameful cohort of copious false works which have unremorsefully deluded and misled thousands by means of personality worship and charlatanism.
Don't be an apologist of the obsolete.