That’s true what you say LostGeneration but it helps the ones who have left know they made a good decision and as for those still in, it always normally takes several things over a long period of time to leave and this helps with that.
Seraphim23
JoinedPosts by Seraphim23
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
Seraphim23
Of course problemaddict but the 1914 doctrine was part of a selection of related doctrinal cards and the final one is now blown away, thats the signficance. Just depends on how you look at it.
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
Seraphim23
No its not Robert King, this is a watchdog group on cults.
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
Seraphim23
Jesus didn't inspect and appoint the fds. Those are their words and it cuts the last link in the chain as they were still clinging to the 1914 doctrine in some ways.
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
Seraphim23
Thankyou!
One will need to download the relevant WT to see it for themselves but the hot bit is Page 8 paragraph 19.
However it says this:
19 In review, what have we learned? In
the beginning of this article, we raised
three “when” questions.We first considered
that the great tribulation did not begin
in 1914 but will start when the United
Nations attacks Babylon the Great.
Then, we reviewed why Jesus’ judgment
of the sheep and the goats did not begin
in 1914 but will occur during the great
tribulation. Finally, we examined why Jesus’
arrival to appoint the faithful slave
over all his belongings did not occur in
1919 but will take place during the great
tribulation. So, then, all three “whens”
apply to the same future time period
—the great tribulation. How does this
adjusted view further affect our understanding
of the illustration of the faithful
slave? Also, how does it affect our
understanding of other parables, or illustrations,
of Jesus that are being fulfilled
during this time of the end? These important
questions will be considered in
the following articles.
This has huge implications people.
-
38
The Watchtower abandons their 1914 doctrine!
by Seraphim23 inhttp://www.watchman.org/blog/index.php/watchtower-society-changes-doctrine-of-1914-again/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed%3a+watchmanfellowship+%28watchman+fellowship%29.
.
not sure how to show the link properly..
-
70
The Small Quiet Voice
by Satanus indo you hear it?
not talking about voices.
i'm talking about that little niggling thing, on the side.
-
Seraphim23
If its evolution through experience, or growth through the exploration of possibilities, it is still fake experience if reality is not reality. Plus when all said and done and all units of life go back to the source, it will realise it is completely on its own because all others were in fact itself, and all is pointlessness trapped in a near infinite memory of fakeness.
What if you are partly correct with the addition that reality is in fact reality, and individuals are real individuals in their own right?
-
70
The Small Quiet Voice
by Satanus indo you hear it?
not talking about voices.
i'm talking about that little niggling thing, on the side.
-
Seraphim23
Well that’s my point, we can’t be certain of a conclusion either way. If it is different from God, then it is a form of reality and not imagination and people can be real, and if it is the same as God nothing new in terms of experience will be created because it comes from God to begin with therefor no advantage in bothering.
-
70
The Small Quiet Voice
by Satanus indo you hear it?
not talking about voices.
i'm talking about that little niggling thing, on the side.
-
Seraphim23
If reality is Gods imagination then experience is from his imagination. However that experience from his imagination can’t be real experience because it comes from him to begin with. So asking how God can know anything before he created anything is the same problem as this. We can’t be smarter than the source because we can’t even understand how this can be solved being slaves to knowledge that is not rooted in any kind of reality that is real reality, according to this way of thinking.
-
70
The Small Quiet Voice
by Satanus indo you hear it?
not talking about voices.
i'm talking about that little niggling thing, on the side.
-
Seraphim23
The thing is why does God need to experience anything at all if he knows all? If all that is experienced is fake, then it isn’t real experience, and God knows nothing. If so called reality is needed in order to experience anything and it is fake there is no experience just as there is no reality. This is but one contradiction to this as an exclusive view point.