Posts by apocalypse

2

Has the WTS unofficially removed the U.N. from it's doctrine?

by Santisimo in

does anyone know if the wts has mentioned the united nations in any of it's magazines aside from the kingdom news publication?

i get thefeeling that the wts has done a complete turn around on this matter and left all the j-dubs out of the loop.. as it is, there is absolutely no sign that the u.n. is trying to destroy religions anywhere in the world.

i can't imagine the u.n. ever taking a stand against radical islam much less the wts.

apocalypse

You make a valid point. My wife and I have both noticed the absence of any UN content.

45

UNDERGROUND RAILROAD (helping JWs see)

by apocalypse in

i am an "active" jw.

i serve.

give talks.

apocalypse

I am an "active" JW. I serve. Give talks. Preach the kingdum.

I also educate from within.

So far, I have helped several.

First, my wife, who is now my best companion and helper in our new vocation.

Next, one whole family out and into a new life. Kudos to them!

Another family knows the "truth" and fades.

Another sister left abruptly and has a new lease on life. Bravo...:)

Presently working on a few. Chiseling away at the WT barnacles on their brains.

Who is with me...?

PS: I wouldn't mind if a new area here could be devoted to this.

25

BRAIN-DEAD QUOTES FROM OCT 1st WT

by Mary in

the writing department should really win an oscar for best screenplay in a comedy/drama series craptower, the article is entitled is the bible too restrictive?

in actuality, every witness knows that this is really asking "is the wts too restrictive?

on page 9 it says in part:

apocalypse

Good post. Seems you hit several "nail(s) on the head"

601

For those not sick to death of talking about this...607 BCE

by Swamboozled in

just got this link sent to me by my sister in law and i just keeping staring at it trying to decide where to start.

i know that arguing with a jw is like throwing miracle wheat in the wind...but i want a comeback!!!

http://www.2001translation.com/587_or_607.htm

apocalypse

Awayz back I said ...

"Seriously, it's not even worth debating the thing with this 3rd fella. The minute you pick out the errors and tell people which coconut he hid the twist under (and there's several twists, omissions ad fabrications) then he disappears for a goodly time and re-appears down the road under a new handle to start over on some fresh minds."

And so it has come true. Third dummy has done a disappearing act after failing to address directly the questions put to him.

And so it goes with all dummies who refuse to accept the truth.

601

For those not sick to death of talking about this...607 BCE

by Swamboozled in

just got this link sent to me by my sister in law and i just keeping staring at it trying to decide where to start.

i know that arguing with a jw is like throwing miracle wheat in the wind...but i want a comeback!!!

http://www.2001translation.com/587_or_607.htm

apocalypse

"... and since we can see clearly that Jerusalem was destroyed in 606... no ...make that 607 BCE, then we KNOW that Armageddon will come in 1975...."

I think that about sums up Watchtower. Ya think...

Seriously, it's not even worth debating the thing with this 3rd fella. The minute you pick out the errors and tell people which coconut he hid the twist under (and there's several twists, omissions ad fabrications) then he disappears for a goodly time and re-appears down the road under a new handle to start over on some fresh minds.

Really, just look at the guy's posting name and see he's a newbie. He will never be more than that. Once you start to debate in earnest, he's gone.

Before you can pick his bones clean he's off to see the wizard. See ya third. Talk to you again when you are yet another fresh newbie.

The 587 date is so firmly established that it's comical to see a fool make his con-artist attempt on the minds of readers.

87

Napa Valley, CA Child Abuse Court Case Victories

by AndersonsInfo in

napa wt child abuse case.

two important court decisions, which came out of napa valley, ca, are now available for us to post on jwd.

these significant rulings overturn objections regularly made by the watchtower in recent lawsuits and may serve as a precedent for future lawsuits.

apocalypse

This is good news. Slowly the casket lid lifts to reveal the "dead men's bones"....

69

Just returned from the 2006 (Armageddon's here) "Deliverance At Hand" DO

by apocalypse in

how much can one person gag?

it is interesting to note that clive thomas (canadian branch office) spoke during his part in such a way as to betray the fact that he was personally aware that what he was saying was false.. it's one thing when a local onion gets exuberant about parroting the gb's nonsense.

it's quite another when a bloodsucker like clive comes from the branch and does a "bait 'n switch" the way he did.

apocalypse

Going over the recordings. Should have the resolution soon. Can also post the MP3

69

Just returned from the 2006 (Armageddon's here) "Deliverance At Hand" DO

by apocalypse in

how much can one person gag?

it is interesting to note that clive thomas (canadian branch office) spoke during his part in such a way as to betray the fact that he was personally aware that what he was saying was false.. it's one thing when a local onion gets exuberant about parroting the gb's nonsense.

it's quite another when a bloodsucker like clive comes from the branch and does a "bait 'n switch" the way he did.

apocalypse

I will print it out when I have a chance to get the recordings together. On an MP3 player now.

69

Just returned from the 2006 (Armageddon's here) "Deliverance At Hand" DO

by apocalypse in

how much can one person gag?

it is interesting to note that clive thomas (canadian branch office) spoke during his part in such a way as to betray the fact that he was personally aware that what he was saying was false.. it's one thing when a local onion gets exuberant about parroting the gb's nonsense.

it's quite another when a bloodsucker like clive comes from the branch and does a "bait 'n switch" the way he did.

apocalypse

Apparently....as wives were mentions as having part in the "uncovering of wrongdoing"

As far as the resolution, I have a recording. I want to get these convention recordings ready for some posting.

69

Just returned from the 2006 (Armageddon's here) "Deliverance At Hand" DO

by apocalypse in

how much can one person gag?

it is interesting to note that clive thomas (canadian branch office) spoke during his part in such a way as to betray the fact that he was personally aware that what he was saying was false.. it's one thing when a local onion gets exuberant about parroting the gb's nonsense.

it's quite another when a bloodsucker like clive comes from the branch and does a "bait 'n switch" the way he did.

apocalypse

How much can one person gag? How much?

It is interesting to note that Clive Thomas (Canadian Branch Office) spoke during his part in such a way as to betray the fact that he was personally aware that what he was saying was false.

It's one thing when a local onion gets exuberant about parroting the GB's nonsense. It's quite another when a bloodsucker like Clive comes from the branch and does a "bait 'n switch" the way he did.

How about that resolution? Can you believe that the GB is so intensely stupid so as to think that they can make a public statement to the effect that we "won't go to chat rooms" and we will all say "AYE" to signal that their problems with the internet exposing them are over???

Oh, and since, (according to the CO), so many MS's and Elders were being "lost to internet porn" ...I guess that making a public "resolution" to the effect that we "won't go to internet porn" will solve that issue too...!

Wait... didn't these same gentlemen make a public resolution of sorts when they agreed to the two bapDismal questions??? And since they didn't hold true to those two "resolutions" what makes the intensely stupid GB think another one will work???