the following are transports of postings on http://www.channelc.org/ made by jim penton and ros regarding myself and james caputo respectively.
the reason that i did not post directly on channel c is that ros and many of her board participants do not like to see anything that resembles catholic discussion, even if the responses are done respectfully and in a spirit of clarifying a false claim or misunderstanding.
i too do not like "catholic" discussions on channel c, and have not posted there for 9 months until i recently posted an announcement about tom cabeen's interviews on ewtn and with randy watters.
Jim W.:
Therefore, as far as I am concerned this thread did its job ... the subject is closed.
At last! It's so good that you've been able to reach this stage! Now those of us who have chosen to remain non-Catholic may feel comfortable in knowing we will no longer feel chided as though we possess inferior knowledge of what Catholicism is all about. Congratulations!
Frank
the following are transports of postings on http://www.channelc.org/ made by jim penton and ros regarding myself and james caputo respectively.
the reason that i did not post directly on channel c is that ros and many of her board participants do not like to see anything that resembles catholic discussion, even if the responses are done respectfully and in a spirit of clarifying a false claim or misunderstanding.
i too do not like "catholic" discussions on channel c, and have not posted there for 9 months until i recently posted an announcement about tom cabeen's interviews on ewtn and with randy watters.
Justitia Themis:
Recommendation: move on, get over it.
You hit the nail on the head. Jim's problem is that he just doesn't seem able to "get over it."
Frank
the following are transports of postings on http://www.channelc.org/ made by jim penton and ros regarding myself and james caputo respectively.
the reason that i did not post directly on channel c is that ros and many of her board participants do not like to see anything that resembles catholic discussion, even if the responses are done respectfully and in a spirit of clarifying a false claim or misunderstanding.
i too do not like "catholic" discussions on channel c, and have not posted there for 9 months until i recently posted an announcement about tom cabeen's interviews on ewtn and with randy watters.
GMahler:
No one is claiming that mistakes were made on only one side at CC. Neither is anyone here condemning the Catholic Church. What I find offensive is Jim W's obvious attempt to smear another forum simply because he hasn't been able to get control of it to promote his own personal agenda.
Frank
the following are transports of postings on http://www.channelc.org/ made by jim penton and ros regarding myself and james caputo respectively.
the reason that i did not post directly on channel c is that ros and many of her board participants do not like to see anything that resembles catholic discussion, even if the responses are done respectfully and in a spirit of clarifying a false claim or misunderstanding.
i too do not like "catholic" discussions on channel c, and have not posted there for 9 months until i recently posted an announcement about tom cabeen's interviews on ewtn and with randy watters.
Jim W.:
Apparently the humor is working since it's found a response. Some agree with it and you yourself have paid attention to it enough to comment on it. No matter how much you deny it, you wittingly brought CC issues here so you could vent your dissatisfaction before many. Though your complaints are admittedly with only "two specific people," you chose to place them before the hundreds and thousands who might visit this thread, many of whom have never heard of CC. That seems quite childish to me.
You fool only those who hold to your viewpoint. To say you are being "kind" while accusing your opponents of being "unreasonable" and 'vehemently hateful' is highly insincere, to say the least.
Additionally, your claim that I don't know what's going on fails to take into account that I've paid attention to CC for years and that I nearly prayed for the day when your long, long, long rambling verbiage would come to an end. I prefer to be your friend rather than your enemy, but as you yourself have said: "The truth is always kind." Consider the truthfulness of what I'm telling you here a kindness on my part.
Frank
the following are transports of postings on http://www.channelc.org/ made by jim penton and ros regarding myself and james caputo respectively.
the reason that i did not post directly on channel c is that ros and many of her board participants do not like to see anything that resembles catholic discussion, even if the responses are done respectfully and in a spirit of clarifying a false claim or misunderstanding.
i too do not like "catholic" discussions on channel c, and have not posted there for 9 months until i recently posted an announcement about tom cabeen's interviews on ewtn and with randy watters.
Yesidid,
Thanks. But of course I don't deserve any credit, really. As you've observed, it's pretty obvious what's going on in this thread.
It is deceptive to claim that the thread is "a kind response." What is so "kind" about making the biased claim that Channel C won't listen to anything that is "respectful" and "balanced"? What is "kind" in claiming that contributors to that forum are intellectually dishonest, sarcastic, unkind, unfair and unreasonable, that they "offer little more than pent up frustrations and attacks," that they employ "a double standard," etc., etc.???
Frank
this blue book united in worship, was studied before baptism.
in 2002 we got the updated version...was it any different?
only two small changes.. 1980 - united in worship-.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/murrieta/stories/pe_news_local_s_sdead29.4016de2.html
murrieta - a 40-year-old mother of two was killed in her murrieta home monday morning, authorities said.
coroner's officials identified the woman as isabelle jarka.
Someone who knows the family said lots of things were stolen, and the husband didn't have any scratches on him. I tend to think the woman was murdered by a thief who panicked when he discovered that she was in the house and she recognized him. He probably had been watching the house in the morning for a few days or more when he saw both husband and wife leave for work together. But that day the husband left the house alone, just to go to a store. Probably when the car pulled out of the garage, the thief thought both were in it and that nobody was in the house.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/murrieta/stories/pe_news_local_s_sdead29.4016de2.html
murrieta - a 40-year-old mother of two was killed in her murrieta home monday morning, authorities said.
coroner's officials identified the woman as isabelle jarka.
The Californian, Temecula, CA 92590
By JOHN HALL - Staff Writer | Friday, May 9, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
MURRIETA ---- Nearly two weeks after a Murrieta woman was found bludgeoned to death in her home no arrests have been made, which has some residents concerned that a killer burglar may be on the loose.
The woman's death was reported by her husband, who told officers he returned home the morning of April 28 and found that the home had been broken into and ransacked. His wife's body was found in the upstairs master bedroom.
On Friday, however, Murrieta police said they don't believe residents have reason to fear.
"If we thought there was a further threat to the public, we would be advising the public of that imminent threat," Murrieta police Lt. Dennis Vrooman said.
The morning of April 28, police received a call from a man who said someone had broken into his Tamarisk Street home and that his wife was dead.
Kelle Jarka told police he returned home about 8:45 a.m. after a 45-minute shopping trip to find the break-in and his wife's body.
Upstairs, police found the body of 40-year-old Isabelle Jarka. A Riverside County coroner's autopsy revealed she had been hit in the head at least 11 times with a blunt object.
Police searched the Jarkas' home, even expanding the search to nearby Harveston Lake in Temecula, but have not found what was used to kill her.
Detectives are looking at all possibilities, including that she may have been killed by someone she knew, Vrooman said.
Neighbors interviewed after the slaying was discovered told The Californian they heard nothing out of the ordinary at the Jarka home that morning.
Police towed three vehicles from the home and have been examining them. What, if any, evidence was found has not been released by detectives.
Police ask that anyone with information about the case call Detective Sgt. Jim Ganley at (951) 461-6361.
Contact staff writer John Hall at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2628, or [email protected].
our new resident scholar, rev1212 informs the board that.... the year 1914, which is the year that the gentile times (aka appointed times of the nations) ended, was determined though a study of the bible along with no doubt some holy spirit given to the brothers that were able to discern this information.. there are quite a few scriptures involved in coming to the year 1914, one of them from ezekiel about "lifting off the crown and it will be no one's until he who has the legal right comes".
so that is the starting point, which was 607 bc, when jerusalem fell to babylon.
then another significant scripture is from daniel chapter 4 which showed the appointed times of the nations would be "seven times".
our new resident scholar, rev1212 informs the board that.... the year 1914, which is the year that the gentile times (aka appointed times of the nations) ended, was determined though a study of the bible along with no doubt some holy spirit given to the brothers that were able to discern this information.. there are quite a few scriptures involved in coming to the year 1914, one of them from ezekiel about "lifting off the crown and it will be no one's until he who has the legal right comes".
so that is the starting point, which was 607 bc, when jerusalem fell to babylon.
then another significant scripture is from daniel chapter 4 which showed the appointed times of the nations would be "seven times".
