It is just good manners.
To some people in some parts of the world. Some of us may find it rather declasse.
.
hi everyone!
was there ever an issue as to whether you were / weren't allowed to wear shoes at a group book study in someones house , so everyone had to dump their shoes at the door?.
It is just good manners.
To some people in some parts of the world. Some of us may find it rather declasse.
http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsites/c/can_you_believe_it/debates/rootofevil.html
just wondering if anyone was planning to watch this tomorrow?.
a lot of religious and right wing sites have already criticised it.
I don't have a nice glib answer for you FD, and although an atheist I confess that I thoroughly enjoy some of the irrationalities associated with many faiths. And I think a lot of brainwashed children on this board managed to free themselves from all sorts of nonsense, just as the religiously educated friends I know have also managed. When it comes down to it I don't seek a planet filled with atheists like me, you and Dawkins.
and it was more interesting than "Big Brother"{Brits know what I mean}
You were only watching it for Jodie, admit it.
http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsites/c/can_you_believe_it/debates/rootofevil.html
just wondering if anyone was planning to watch this tomorrow?.
a lot of religious and right wing sites have already criticised it.
They are victims.
My point isn't whether or not they are victimns but that in using such loaded language to their Rabbi school teacher Dawkins emotively condemns him as the perpetrator. It's that that I find unhelpful to a debate on faith schools - religious idealogues thrive on confrontation and their faith and resolve is ever strengthened.
http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsites/c/can_you_believe_it/debates/rootofevil.html
just wondering if anyone was planning to watch this tomorrow?.
a lot of religious and right wing sites have already criticised it.
I watched it and again found him slightly embarrassing - although the flushed face and angry look in his eye were slightly less prevalent this week. Curiously it reminded me of being a Witness again when Witnesses appeared on TV and they were wack jobs and I'd groan internally.
Dawkins isn't a wack job, I agree with most of his argument but his language is so loaded e.g. refering to children in religious shools as victims, and his manner so dogmatic that his message is slightly obscured. Liked his closing quote that a religion allows good people do bad things.
And has anyone been to a "Hell House"? It looked fantastic!
cnn's anderson cooper has a huge following of female supporters.
his intelligent, handsome, caring, genuine and a vanderbilt heir.
his sexual orientation has been questionable but those in the gay community insist he is the most "openly gay anchor" on tv.
Whether or not he's gay and gagged by CNN has long been discussed by the online gay press - google him and you'll see.
Does it matter whether or not he's out? Unfortunately, yes. The only reason not to be out is because of negative repercussions, and if high profile members of the media remain closeted the situation continues. If the only acceptable gay faces are to be hairdressers, queer eye etc we remain clowns. Considering just how gay the entertainment industry is, how come there are no gay Hollywood stars? Ruper Everett and Nathan Lane are hardly A list.
the travel channel aired a show, "most haunted" featuring the city walks and horribly, macabre underground vaults of edinburgh.
supposedly the poor lived beneath the streets in caves and caverns where robbery and murder took place.
the ghosts said to roam the underground rooms are angry and agressive with visitors, sometimes touching, pushing, or calling their names.
"salt of the earth"? You mean "common."
In interests of fairness... Glasgow and Edinburgh are both great cities, not as different as chalk and cheese but with enough differences to make them both great places. Visitors to Glasgow may have to look a little harder to find its good points compared to Edinburgh's immediate visual impact, and social inequality may be more apparent in the city centre than in Edinburgh's but it's still well worth spending time in. The fact that Glasgow's pleasures take a little more effort to find probably makes them more satisfying.
cnn's anderson cooper has a huge following of female supporters.
his intelligent, handsome, caring, genuine and a vanderbilt heir.
his sexual orientation has been questionable but those in the gay community insist he is the most "openly gay anchor" on tv.
What makes you so certain it's a chick?
Amanda's actually moved beyond the restrictions of gender.
cnn's anderson cooper has a huge following of female supporters.
his intelligent, handsome, caring, genuine and a vanderbilt heir.
his sexual orientation has been questionable but those in the gay community insist he is the most "openly gay anchor" on tv.
Old news (Gretchen, you really should get off that rocking chair!).
The chick with the lips is Amanda Lepore, people, entirely self created without the hand of god.
the travel channel aired a show, "most haunted" featuring the city walks and horribly, macabre underground vaults of edinburgh.
supposedly the poor lived beneath the streets in caves and caverns where robbery and murder took place.
the ghosts said to roam the underground rooms are angry and agressive with visitors, sometimes touching, pushing, or calling their names.
Scotsman picks up his skirts and flees the Buckfast fueled Freedom Fighter.
the travel channel aired a show, "most haunted" featuring the city walks and horribly, macabre underground vaults of edinburgh.
supposedly the poor lived beneath the streets in caves and caverns where robbery and murder took place.
the ghosts said to roam the underground rooms are angry and agressive with visitors, sometimes touching, pushing, or calling their names.
Funny that the M8's the best thing about Glasgow too - stops you from having to drive through the city centre.