Posts by DJS

47

The Illusion of Superiority

by Coded Logic in

after reading dozens and dozens of posts and hundreds of comments, it seems to me that a great many people on this forum think that since they figured out ttatt, they must therefore be a highly intelligent and incredibly rational individual.

let me take a moment to congratulate everyone.

its a big step to figure this out - i know.. that said, it doesn't make you a genius!

DJS

CL,

I think I understand what you are trying to accomplish. When I first came on the site a year ago I was amazed at the lack of understanding that many had about simple debating skills. Debates are about two things: facts and the correct interpretation (logic) associated with those facts. Anything that isn't about those two things is a tactic or an irrational, emotional response.

You kinda sorta violated your own OP in your opening sentence, which is possibly why some have responded as they have. Note:

"After reading dozens and dozens of posts and hundreds of comments, it seems to me that a great many people on this forum think that since they figured out TTATT, they must therefore be a highly intelligent and incredibly rational individual."

"Great many" is offensive and an irrational, likely unsupported by the facts, statement. Great many means kinda sorta everyone but you.

And you made definitive 'conclusions' about why the great many are responding as you describe, that they "think that since they figured out TTATT, they must therefore be a highly intelligent and incredibly rational individual." That's an unsupported, likely erroneous, definitive statement. Have you any data which supports such a definitive statement?

So don't be surprised that a 'great many' haven't responded in a touchy feeling manner. Your presentation skills can stand some improvement. I agree with you that a lack of understanding about what constitutes debate and how to logically construct or de-construct an argument need some assistance, but your presentation failed to adequately provide it.

Try again (big smiley face). I'm on your side.

147

Your views and ideas on forum areas and organization?

by Simon in

this may come as a shock to some people, but the current forum structure was kind of thrown together without much real thought and then evolved a bit over time.

there are a few things that particularly grate on me and areas where i don't think the subjects work particularly well.

'friends' is a bit vague and becomes a dumping ground, news & world events vs politics & current affairs is hard to decide sometimes, child abuse is a scandal but isn't contained withing 'scandals & coverups' etc.... with a new forum platform imminent, it's a good time to solicit ideas to improve things.

DJS

More Paris stuff,

I've reviewed your posts since you joined a little over a month with no introduction: Hates men, Supports the segregation of atheists away from theists. Paints with a broad brush. Hates elders (men), Likes to talk about science but I can't freaking figure out what she is saying.

All of these things are identical to Village Girl.

Village Girl. Hello young lady. Nice to see you again.

147

Your views and ideas on forum areas and organization?

by Simon in

this may come as a shock to some people, but the current forum structure was kind of thrown together without much real thought and then evolved a bit over time.

there are a few things that particularly grate on me and areas where i don't think the subjects work particularly well.

'friends' is a bit vague and becomes a dumping ground, news & world events vs politics & current affairs is hard to decide sometimes, child abuse is a scandal but isn't contained withing 'scandals & coverups' etc.... with a new forum platform imminent, it's a good time to solicit ideas to improve things.

DJS

Cofty,

I don't know if Paris is VG, but there are a lot of similarities. Both paint with broad brushes, both have an obsession and hatred for elders and are quick to use it as a strawman and both will completely ignore data that doesn't support their views. Paris: I agree that most people believe in a god of some type; can you agree with the equally excellent empirical data that suggests the more secular and atheistic a country/region/state is the more likely it is functional, educated and intelligent??? Because that's what the data - a lot of it - suggests. That does not mean, Paris, that all theists are stupid or that all atheists are smart. I have qualified this data numerous times. A little humility on your part would be to simply: a. agree; b. be silent; or c. refute it with equally valid empirical data. You haven't done any of those things yet, but those are your only real grown-up alternatives. Ad hominem attacks don't count, but to this point that's all you got. And that too is just like VG.

Or will you attack me that I always have to be right? For a newbie you certainly have canned ad hominem attacks prepared for people you shouldn't know. And don't give me the researching the site crap. I think Cofty is right.

152

HOW TO AVOID THE A-HOLE SPIRIT OF SOME HERE...

by DATA-DOG in

1) take meds for your megalomania and delusions of grandeur.. .

suggestions welcome.. .

dd.

DJS

Lawyers are all money grabbing, ambulance chasing, charlatans. So BOTR, if every few weeks someone came on this site and spewed this nonsense, I think you would have more than a little bit to say about it. And yet you think the theists who spew such nonsense about how atheists are war mongering, baby killing whores is not starting something??????? I have never started a war or killed any babies!! (2 out of 3 aint bad).

I would stand up for lawyers if such nonsense was spewed. I would stand up for theists if such nonsense was spewed. I do not see you or any other of the theists standing up for atheists when such nonsense is typed into the keyboards of dumbass theists (don't hate me because I'm right Paris). ANYONE making definitive statements which are completely wrong is a dumbass, including atheists.

The data we present is very good empirical data. Attacking those presenting it is childish, churlish, immature and tells all the lurkers you have no case. Deconstruct the data or hush. It's really that simple. There is likely no significant difference between the average theist and the average atheist in intelligence, etc., but the data suggests over a large population there are certain differences. Take it up with those conducting the research, but attacking me because I used to be an elder, which has absolutely nothing to do with this, or that you think (Paris) that I have to always be right (when all I am doing is defending myself) (BOTR) is so tepidly weak and childish that I really don't have to respond.

And BOTR, like you I wish the back and forth silliness would stop. Most of my friends are theists. I love them. I would die for most of them. They are smart, bright, caring, decent people. But so are my athiest friends. There. I'm through with this topic. For now anyway.

49

My Story: from JW Elder to Born Again Christian to Agnostic

by passwordprotected in

i first posted here on 3rd june 2008. at the time i was an elder, appointed the previous october, i was 36 and i was a born-in.

at the time i'd become disillusioned with the society due to the governing body's letter explaining why the book study in private homes was being abolished.

april 2008 saw me start questioning this decision, privately of course, and this eventually led me to this site, to jwfacts and to many youtube videos, all of which began to errode my faith in the leaders of the organisation.. in july 2008, having discussed my doubts with my wife, i attended the district convention, deciding to give the society one last chance to convince me it was the truth.

DJS

Password,

Your experience is deeply touching. Thank you for sharing it, and good luck to you on your journey.

152

HOW TO AVOID THE A-HOLE SPIRIT OF SOME HERE...

by DATA-DOG in

1) take meds for your megalomania and delusions of grandeur.. .

suggestions welcome.. .

dd.

DJS

Phizzy and ADCMS,

Yes and yes. Several years ago when I was completing my undergraduate degree, one of my profs - in a relgious course I was taking - made the following statement: "The only place belief in god is in short supply is in a seminary." He had a PhD in divinity, served at several churches in various capacities and was essentially an atheist.

He was using hyperbole to illustrate what I have been saying for a while. Seminary students, one would think, would be most inclined to believe in god. However, they may enter seminary as strong feelers/believers with some (one sided) knowledge about the topic, but after many years of studying and researching all sides of the topic, many of the students end up just like many of the atheists on this site.

That's what I continue to try to get across to theists, but without much success. Once someone is entrenched based on feelings and beliefs, which are the two lowest rungs on our evolutionary scale, there isn't much that can change that. Most if not all of the arguments revolve around this very simple matter. A lot of theists firmly plant their feet, fist their hands and become even more entenched. And when they can't win any arguments - and they never will -because faith/belief cannot be proven and the primary source is the bible (I mean, really?), they resort to calling us arrogant and mean.

This is the primary reason why almost every OP on this site fairly quickly separates itself into the theist/non-theist camps, even when the topic is secular, social in nature. It's the process by which theists 'make up their minds' that is the main problem.

I will most certainly believe in god whenever she clearly presents herself. As Dubs we prided ourselves in our study and 'knowledge.' Until many of us discovered it was based on a faulty premise/source, the 'knowledge' was completey one sided and shallow, and it was supported by a 'spin' machine of historic proportions - the WTB&TS.

Feellings and beliefs are fine. Lack of self control in locating the keyboard isn't. It will result in the ready deconstruction of the argument, and as Phiz states, they should expect " . . .derision, ridicule and lampooning. . " All of that could be fixed by avoiding the keyboard.

12

Treatment of DFed family members. JW.org FAQ vs Nov 2014 WT

by EndofMysteries in

on jw.org faq, " do jehovahs witnesses shun former members of their religion?, those who were baptized as jehovahs witnesses but no longer preach to others, perhaps even drifting away from association with fellow believers, are not shunned.....what of a man who is disfellowshipped but whose wife and children are still jehovahs witnesses?

the religious ties he had with his family change, but blood ties remain.

the marriage relationship and normal family affections and dealings continue.".

DJS

NavyTown,

Let's hope some of the fence sitters will wake up, but this is typical Borgian monologue. It seems to answer the questions a few have posed recently about whether the Dark Lords would loosen their death grip on the rank and file and become a kinder, gentler Borganization. End of time cults double down with more of the harsh control, eat their own (paranoid delusionial) and circle the wagons (Satan and his hordes are a comin' after 'em), when pressured or when they feel threatened, and they likely are feeling a lot of that right now. Good for them.

The Dark Lords are closer to Jim Jones and Heaven's Gate than they are to any mainstream belief system. They have been and still are an end-of-time drama princess crying shrilly in the night about pending doom. The narcissism fueling the Dark Lords drives them to more of the same draconian controls. The rank and file buy off on this stuff because they hope that they are just oh so close to salvation. Look at how bad the world is!!! (Don't pay any attention to the good stuff). And they will be the only ones making it through!! Isn't that special.

The Dark Lords love power and control more than they love sheeple. The numbers and increase merely fuel the narcissism and reinforces the power and control. They likely love power and control more than growth/increase, as they can spin this as a separation work of the wheat and the chaff and blame that Satan guy. Increase is proof that Jah is with them. Decrease is proof that Jah is with them. Persecution is proof that Jah is with them. Peace is proof that Jah is with them (that peace and security BS). Money is proof that Jah is with them.

But a lack of money????? Their Achilles heel.

I doubt they love power and control more than money, which is the only thing that would possibly result in a kinder gentler Borganization. If the Dubs really want to get their attention, stop donating.

Anyway, NavyTown, I like your posts. Thanks.

152

HOW TO AVOID THE A-HOLE SPIRIT OF SOME HERE...

by DATA-DOG in

1) take meds for your megalomania and delusions of grandeur.. .

suggestions welcome.. .

dd.

DJS

BOTR,

If the shoe doesn't fit you don't wear it. I am not of course talking about all those responding to these types of OPs and comments, only those making the definitive and wrong statements. I respect and like you and your comments. You and I have been on the same side on many OPs. All I am asking of you is that you use some of the fair mindedness and toughness in this matter that you show when dealing with legal matters and those showing a rush to judgment against others unfairly.

Definitive statements made without regard to the actual facts is dumbassedness, regardless of who it is. I don't put you in that category.

152

HOW TO AVOID THE A-HOLE SPIRIT OF SOME HERE...

by DATA-DOG in

1) take meds for your megalomania and delusions of grandeur.. .

suggestions welcome.. .

dd.

DJS

Paris,

Ditto to ADCMS,

All we are doing is refuting dumbass statements made by theists. Of course there are a lot of very intelligent theists and a lot of stupid atheists. We continue to cite very good empirical data which illustrate strong correlations. Nothing more. As I have done everytime, the data suggests strong correlations, not direct correlations or cause/effect.

If you could read you would understand that. I will stop posting this kind of material when you and the other theists stop making dumb-ass definitive statements which have absolutely no basis in fact.

If you have a problem with the individuals who conduct theses studies or the methodologies they employ to synthesize the data and draw conclusions or findings from it, then I suggest you spend your time dismantling it instead of posting tepid, immature attacks on those posting the data. Otherwise, the best option for you - and those like you - would be to show some X-tian humility and aviod the keyboard. Or not. The more you and those like you spew nonsense the more you validate the research. I will repeat: A LOT of theists are very intelligent, and a lot of atheists are morons. The data suggests strong correlations.

You stop and I will stop. It's simple.

152

HOW TO AVOID THE A-HOLE SPIRIT OF SOME HERE...

by DATA-DOG in

1) take meds for your megalomania and delusions of grandeur.. .

suggestions welcome.. .

dd.

DJS

Outlaw,

Agreed. I'm no zealot, except for life. This forum is my only experience at such things in the past 2 decades. I also agree that both sides start things, but - and you can check my posting history - I avoid theist and scientific dicussions. I care nothing for the former and know little about the latter.

My only point is that the common refrain from the theists about how hopeless, evil, cold, sterile and immoral I am kinda sorta annoys me. Like clockwork, they arrive and spew the same sentiments. Some who have been on this site for a long time and know better also spew the same nonsense.

If the same broad based and erroneous statements were made about blacks, gays, Jews or theists, I would jump in with support. And the former college prof in me grates at definitive statements without empirical data to support them.

Thanks Outlaw.