Well, I must be naive, but I thought they promoted the truth and were not scared of contraversy. I wrote to them years ago about the scripture about 'the Cushite changing his skin' and brought out that since the scripture was written by Jeremiah, who was from a priestly class and who also would be adverse to markings on the skin and plus Jeremiah later MENTIONS point blank skin markings...that the said scripture was talking about the markings on the skin of a Cushite. Since they all basically had the same skin color, the differences here would not be a Caucasian Jeremiah looking at a "Negroid" Cushite.
I thought it interesting that not long after that letter there was an Awake on the skin markings of Blacks, but no mention of the Jeremiah scripture.
Oh, yes, I also mentioned that the leopard can change his spots in the poetic sense. (Which Jews, including Jesus, frequently spoke) A panther is nothing but a leopard whose spots are obscure because the spots and the leopard are black. But notice, it is talking about the 'markings' of the leopard, not his whole covering (fur over skins technically) Just the markings. As so why would Jeremiah all of a sudden go out of context and now start talking about skin color? Not all of us see like American White Males. But Some power ridden American White Males want us to think that way. How many people have even questioned that racist view?
So, you may be right. There may be an underlying reason why they do not want the information promoted. Althought it is out there for all to view. Are all of the people in power of Jehovah's Witnesses White Males?
Oh, and by the way, the majority running away in droves because of the expose I believe would be Black. I have never heard so many Blacks with pre 1960 mentality than in this organization. And I live in the south and it is pretty bad down here. LOL
Have a blessed day. Is your Bio on here about your growing up as a Jehovah's Witnesses?