I wouldn't doubt that the WTBTS takes credit for 'dictionary' first. Didn't CT Russell invent motion pictures?
eyeuse2badub
i saw this on some exjw website where allegedly in regards to gj jwfacts said "he made the first dictionary for the language of tuvalu where he was a special pioneer and became favoured by the king of tuvalu who he would have meals with, so he does not seem to have an issue with mixing with politics... ".
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/scandals/175970/1/do-you-happen-to-know-any-of-the-7-newer-gb-members-what-are-they-like-any-hope-for-positive-changes.
this however doesn't make a lot of sense since tuvalu doesn't have a king, their monarch is elizabeth ii.
I wouldn't doubt that the WTBTS takes credit for 'dictionary' first. Didn't CT Russell invent motion pictures?
eyeuse2badub
i haven't seen the 2014 yearbook on the jw site yet.
i'm looking to see if the number of partakers has increased again (as it has for many years now).
anyone have a scan of it yet?.
The number of partakers keeps increasing (as we get closer to the END) despite the FACT that the WTBTS 'promised' us that the opposite would happen. So, either:
1) the END is not getting closer,
2) the WTBTS was wrong (I know-not a chance), or
3) at the AGM in 2014 (100 year anniversary of something) the newest of all new light will 'identify' all other JW's who are now considered "domestics" worthy to partake.
Praise Jah for the FDS!
eyeuse2badub
i haven't seen the 2014 yearbook on the jw site yet.
i'm looking to see if the number of partakers has increased again (as it has for many years now).
anyone have a scan of it yet?.
because if you just read it then its plain that all should partake of the emblems and go to heaven etc.
they get around that by saying it only applied to those when written who all anointed and then a small group today.
so they take away the bible for the average witness.
I've noticed over the 50+ years I was a JW that JW's really only know about 75-80 scriptures from the Bible. These 75-80 scriptures are used in their literature and at meetings and in FS about 80% of the time. JW's use these 75-80 as 'proof texts' to prove THEIR beliefs. And, of course, these 75-80 scriptures are usually taken out of context or give a 'figurative','symbolic', or 'prophetic' meaning depending on the circumstances. Just recycle it and say it over and over and it becomes TRUTH.
eyeuse2badub
nelson mandela has passed on.
he was a symbol of hope and peace to many.
has his life and achievements meant anything personal to members of jwn?.
If only Nelson would have been on the GB when released from prison. Instead we got Rutherford.
eyeuse2badub
just asking for help from the vast number of very knowledgeable people here.
when was the "stake" doctrine adopted by jw's and what publication contains that information.
thank you..
The ONLY reason JW's dug up stuff about 'stake verses cross' was because of Rutherford. He was forming HIS own religion and needed to be different in everyway from all others. Didn't make any difference if HIS doctrines were believeable or reasonable, they just needed to be different.
eyeuse2badub
these guys are real company men when they have mass lay off of older bethelites tossing them to the curb and making the congregation they are assigned to carry some of the load, so that the watchtower corporation can cut costs of providing for these nolonger young people who have devoted theirs lives to the corporation.. they are heartless bastards aren't they?
i wonder what kind of undercurrent this is causing at headquartes?.
marked
i saw this mentioned in a post.
i thought it deserved a thread of its own.
i liked how this article reasoned with the reader how a religion can cross over into cult territory very quickly.. "the harm stems from a system that shuns and ostracizes adherents that don't accept their exclusive claims to truth.
marked
i would love to hear the views of believers on this subject.. the mormon cult used to say this was black skin, and was one of the reasons why that cult would appoint black men to the preisthood.
but they weren't the only ones who considered this to be the case.. the interesting thing is this mark offered cain god's ordained protection despite his killing his brother.
why would god afford him protection when murder was punishable by death?
The 'mark of Cain' was the ancient equivalent to the modern English letters "H" and "S". IMHO, I think Cain was the very first member of the Humane Society. He probably became indignant at Abel for slaughtering innocent animals. Did Abel slaughter sheep just for the purpose of sacrifice? They didn't eat flesh at that time, right? So why did Jehovah want blood sacrifices so early in mankind's history? It seems to me that Abel was the first to shed innocent blood mentioned in the Bible. Just saying.
eyeuse2badub
if you look at the first page of the kingdom ministry for december (link here), read the talk entitled: "the theocratic ministry school for 2014".
here is a copy of what it says (bold & red mine).
talk by the school overseer.
The only way to 'update' the "Truth"(tm) is with truthier truth (aka nu lite). Everybody knows that.
eyeuse2badub