Ooops. Sorry. :)
Is there any more reason to hang on to this fantasy that they are LOVING and following some TRUTH?
my jw friend told me there was a part on the service meeting last night, about calling on inactive ones.
we knew that was in the km.
she said the po gave it as a talk, and said there were 15 inactive ones in their territory (we are 2 of them), and that elders had been assigned to call on all of them to encourage them.. but..................he said all those in the congregation can and should call on inactive ones regularly, and truly encourage them.
Ooops. Sorry. :)
Is there any more reason to hang on to this fantasy that they are LOVING and following some TRUTH?
my jw friend told me there was a part on the service meeting last night, about calling on inactive ones.
we knew that was in the km.
she said the po gave it as a talk, and said there were 15 inactive ones in their territory (we are 2 of them), and that elders had been assigned to call on all of them to encourage them.. but..................he said all those in the congregation can and should call on inactive ones regularly, and truly encourage them.
So, using the SHEEP analogy: If a sheep strays from the flock, the shepard has to wait for an order from his boss before he starts searching for the lost sheep? He needs to be told that, when he finds that sheep he needs to be NICE TO IT instead of kicking it all the way back to flock? And the rest of the flock needs to be told to be nice to it and not engage in actions that would DRIVE IT AWAY AGAIN??! And that, if the boss doesn't tell the shepard and the flock to do these things then they will do NOTHING??!!
Kind of goes against what the definition of a spiritual leader is, doesn't it? Afterall, the Bible also used the Sheep analogy as when talking about leaders.
my jw friend told me there was a part on the service meeting last night, about calling on inactive ones.
we knew that was in the km.
she said the po gave it as a talk, and said there were 15 inactive ones in their territory (we are 2 of them), and that elders had been assigned to call on all of them to encourage them.. but..................he said all those in the congregation can and should call on inactive ones regularly, and truly encourage them.
So, using the SHEEP analogy: If a sheep strays from the flock, the shepard has to wait for an order from his boss before he starts searching for the lost sheep? He needs to be told that, when he finds that sheep he needs to be NICE TO IT instead of kicking it all the way back to flock? And the rest of the flock needs to be told to be nice to it and not engage in actions that would DRIVE IT AWAY AGAIN??! And that, if the boss doesn't tell the shepard and the flock to do these things then they will do NOTHING??!!
Kind of goes against what the definition of a spiritual leader is, doesn't it? Afterall, the Bible also used the Sheep analogy as when talking about leaders. Is there
my jw friend told me there was a part on the service meeting last night, about calling on inactive ones.
we knew that was in the km.
she said the po gave it as a talk, and said there were 15 inactive ones in their territory (we are 2 of them), and that elders had been assigned to call on all of them to encourage them.. but..................he said all those in the congregation can and should call on inactive ones regularly, and truly encourage them.
So, using the SHEEP analogy: If a sheep strays from the flock, the shepard has to wait for an order from his boss before he starts searching for the lost sheep? He needs to be told that, when he finds that sheep he needs to be NICE TO IT instead of kicking it all the way back to flock? And the rest of the flock needs to be told to be nice to it and not engage in actions that would DRIVE IT AWAY AGAIN??! And that, if the boss doesn't tell the shepard and the flock to do these things then they will do NOTHING??!!
Kind of goes against what the definition of a spiritual leader is, doesn't it? Afterall, the Bible also used the Sheep analogy as when talking about leaders. Is there any
.
i think as time goes on and dna gets understood better and better it will be imposible for fundamental christians to defend thier position against evolution.
kind of like the catholic church going against galileio saying the "earth is not the center of the universe".. "eventually"(maybe not now) to fight against the evidence makes you look very stupid and under heavy mind control.. don't get me wrong i beleive there is a god, and i think he used "gradualism" to create the universe and life, i even feel the first 2 chapter of genesis are discribing a very long drawn out process that took just as evolutionist are telling us, billions of years till finally man appears.. eventually the wt is going to have to change its understanding of genesis to even stay credible..
What I find kind of funny about how some people refer to the "Days" that it took to create the universe and how they think those days are literal is this: Days are relative depending on what planet you are on. A day on Pluto is a completely different ammount of time that it is on earth. But it IS a day if you were from Pluto. Our days last 24 hours. A day is just the amount of time it takes for your planet to complete one full rotation. And every planet spins at a different speed. If one planet take 10 of our years for it to complete one revolution, that's still ONE DAY, TO THEM. So it's relative.
Not only that, but a few of those first "Days" were actually before there were any planets created! So the universal concept of a day didn't even exist at that point. Without any planets spinning you are without a basis for reference to be able to calculate an actual day. So these days of creation must be figurative. Either that or it's a day according to the timeline of Heaven. The dimension that Heaven is located in may have their own days and they may be of a different length of time than our days. But, as I said, it's relative. And it really doesn't matter anyway. Why is there so much arguement over it anyway? It's insignificant and has nothing to do with anything regarding faith.
visiting a few jw/xjw forums lately, i'm reminded of phrases that have been never been brought to mind for 25 years.
(king of the north, jonadabs, etc, etc.
) i got to thinking again about that infamous old harlot, babylon the great.
I never thought about it that way. What make the JW's any different than the rest of them? They are registered with the government just like all the others are. They recieve benefits from the government just like the others do. The only difference is that they don't give the benefits back to the community. They horde it all for themselves. So they are profiting from the governemt for being a religion. They are recieving a paycheck from the Beast. Which means that they WORK for the Beast. They are in league together. If they were truely neutral to the governments of the world then they would not be registered with them and they would refuse any special treatment from them. Because they don't means they will fall just like the others, according to their own screwed up proffecy.
i used to be a jw for a few years but i left it behind like a pair of dirty underwear.
at first it seemed good.
the people were all very nice and inviting (of course they would be), the teachings seemed logical.
Thanks. This is a very interesting board. I'm enjoying it and learning alot about everyone elses bad experiences with this organization. There were alot of other questions I had for these elders that I wanted answers but I can't remember what they were. When they come to me I'll post them here. It was funny to see their reactions. It was kinda like a "How the hell do we answer this one?"
"Dodge it and get him out of here!"
:)
how do you visualize a year?
in my mind, i see a year as a sphere, where january is on top, and july in on the bottom.
january 1st---------on top of the sphere.
I also see the months as a clock going counter-clockwise, but I visualize it in 3-D and the clock rotates depending on the month. During the first half of the year I see the clock face facing straight out at me, in my mind.
During the last half of the year the clock rotates about 45 degrees to the left so that this gives me more of the percpective that the months are CLIMBING UP to December.
they are seriously backpeddling, these freakin jackasses!
they have changed their mind about the issue of blood transfusions and have made it a non-disfellowshipping act!
while i never agreed with it to begin with i think this is crazy.
I found it here. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/790967.stm
It was a link that I found while visiting this site: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/790967.stm
Some very interesting things indeed! I never heard of the UN scandal before today so I looked it up. Those rat bastards are bad mouthing the UN in one breath and secretly aligning themselves with them in the other breath. I've missed alot of action since I left. Glad of it too.
they are seriously backpeddling, these freakin jackasses!
they have changed their mind about the issue of blood transfusions and have made it a non-disfellowshipping act!
while i never agreed with it to begin with i think this is crazy.
They are seriously backpeddling, these freakin jackasses! They have changed their mind about the issue of blood transfusions and have made it a non-disfellowshipping act! While I never agreed with it to begin with I think this is crazy.
"If a member has a transfusion, they will, by their actions disassociate themselves from the religion. The ruling emphasises personal choice, he said. He added that if they repented afterwards, they would be offered spiritual comfort and the possibility of redemption.If a member has a transfusion, they will, by their actions disassociate themselves from the religion. The ruling emphasises personal choice, he said. He added that if they repented afterwards, they would be offered spiritual comfort and the possibility of redemption."
So basically you can have one, be treated like crap by everyone else, repent, and all is forgiven. Sounds like the Catholics: You can do whatever you want as long as you repent afterward.
I tell ya what. If I had a loved one that died because she couldn't get a transfusion that she really wanted and needed to save their life I would sue the hell out of the WBTS after they change their minds!