hard to remember but I think my member started to REALLY take off around onset of puberty
oh sorry. misread.
hard to remember but I think my member started to REALLY take off around onset of puberty
oh sorry. misread.
what say you on the following news article?.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/5954814.htmwoman sues to hide face in license photo.
mike schneider.
Despite the fact that it is against their religious beliefs to do so, and that the American constitution guarantees free exercise of religion?
The freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are absolute in theory, only in that they do not infringe upon each other. Neither are they without subjection to regulation. For instance you have the right to assemble, but you don't have the right to throw up an assembly building that does not pass building code. You have the right to practice worship as you choose, but not human sacrifice, even if the sacrificee is willing. You have the right to own a gun, but you can't if you are a felon. You have the right to free speech, but you do not have the right to slander and liber another person.
Free exercize of religion and Sharya Law do not mix very well. However it must be said, that Muhammed said that it was better to wear a veil of humility rather then a physical one. So do we take every interpretation into account? That fact is that muslim women can wear veils, but if they want to drive on public roads they must have a driver's liscence. The driver's liscence must have a clear identification on it. Law enforcement must be able to properly identify the driver. If all muslim women have a liscence with the same non-descript veiled image, how can police do their job without violating the right of Due Process?
Now here is something you may not have thought of: I would suspect many of these muslim women have passports or have used one at one point or another. Do you think think that Immigration accepts a veilled picture? No and they cannot be expected to.
dear fellow brothers in arms,.
the time has come for me to bid you farewell.
this monday was a day to memorialize our fallen heroes.
Good Bye Victor. I wish I'd known you.
what say you on the following news article?.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/5954814.htmwoman sues to hide face in license photo.
mike schneider.
And when they're stopped by a traffic cop, should they have to show their face then?
Absolutely. This is a no-brainer.
a couple of things i forgot to mention... -it would not be "wise" to have open bars at witness wedding receptions.. -dating non-witnesses like going to the morgue to find a mate.
(this was mentioned at the latest circuit assembly as well).. -there are "deplorable conditions" in christendom...not in jah's org.. -we reflect the glory of god by preaching.. -(this is a doosy, and an actual statement made by the speaker)..just as jesus was hated by the world, but was perfect, so too is jehovahs' organization.
(yes he actually said this).. -3:05 sat.
Wait till the first non-witness comes in, eats a ham sandwich that's sat in the heat to long, and contracts some form of food poisoning. A lawsuit will bring "New Light" about coolers, I reckon.
what say you on the following news article?.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/5954814.htmwoman sues to hide face in license photo.
mike schneider.
hams, I try to see it on both sides
On the one side, Islam is an old religion that has had its cultural footprint on many countries throughout history. Many muslims are peaceful, good citizens.
On the other hand most muslims support violence in the name if islam. They've turned every area they control into a cultural backwater with no scientific progress and little to show except for endless cycles of war at the hands of despots. Their religion's founder was a violent pedophile, and the religion grew, not on its merits, but at the point of the sword. The only reason anyone is worried about how muslims are treated is the threat that they might be next. Islam is a disease on mother earth, and the very worst of the monotheistic cults.
They should get their damn picture taken showing their face, if they want to drive.
The "Proclaimers" book was not for everyone when it came out. In fact that book (and its caste-system release) was one of my first real signs that things weren't quite as they seemed.
what say you on the following news article?.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/5954814.htmwoman sues to hide face in license photo.
mike schneider.
If the courts allow muslim women (they shouldn't wear veils.. arab women are really rather pretty, sometimes) then next sikhs will wear turbans in their liscence photos, and Church of Subgenius members will wear Arnold Palmer golf hats.
.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,965319,00.html
.
If Rumsfeld and his puppet Bush wasnted he WMD's destroyed (in the threat of war) surely they believe Iraq would have notified the world that they HAD destroyed the WMDs prior to the deadline for bombing. The Bush Junta makes less and less sense every day. The scary thing is they are almost a shoe-in for reelection.
I wonder how one immigrates to Canada.
what say you on the following news article?.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/5954814.htmwoman sues to hide face in license photo.
mike schneider.
At last we know the REAL reason Saudis won't let their women drive.