Posts by ILoveTTATT

posted

16
I am going back...
by ILoveTTATT in
1. jw
2. friends
i have decided i will go back to the jw's.

this will be my last post on this site.

i hope jehovah has mercy on me for being so insolent and thinking that his organization was wrong... how could i have thought that!!
ILoveTTATT

Londo that's great news!! What would be your first official edict as the JW overlord? =P
16
I am going back...
by ILoveTTATT in
1. jw
2. friends
i have decided i will go back to the jw's.

this will be my last post on this site.

i hope jehovah has mercy on me for being so insolent and thinking that his organization was wrong... how could i have thought that!!
ILoveTTATT

LOL I chickened out!! Otherwise ppl would be affected by Poe's Law lol
16
I am going back...
by ILoveTTATT in
1. jw
2. friends
i have decided i will go back to the jw's.

this will be my last post on this site.

i hope jehovah has mercy on me for being so insolent and thinking that his organization was wrong... how could i have thought that!!
ILoveTTATT

I have decided I will go back to the JW's. This will be my last post on this site. I hope Jehovah has mercy on me for being so insolent and thinking that His Organization was wrong... How could I have thought that!! They are all just imperfect men...

I recommend to everyone here to do the same...

Look at your calendars!! It is April 1st, 2014, almost 100 years since Christ Jesus started ruling... Armageddon's surely coming soon!!
6
WT article covering 587 and the missing 20 years?
by UnConfused in
1. watchtower
2. bible
published in the last two or three years,please and thank you..
ILoveTTATT

You're welcome!! It's called the KISS method of debunking the 587/607 date...
6
Bokeh - The art of the blur
by ILoveTTATT in
1. social
2. entertainment
a lot of times, when people look at pictures taken by a point-and-shoot vs an slr, they know something is different, but just can't pinpoint exactly what it is.... it is the shallower depth of field.... see.

http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?id=109.

abiblestudent said he likes pictures with large apertures and black-and-white.
ILoveTTATT

Wow Lisa!! Upload them here if you wish!! I would love to see them!! I took these using very, very fast settings on my camera. You have to make the shutter speed really fast, like 1/200 or 1/400, widest aperture you can, and relatively high ISO so the pictures are not too dark. If they come out dark... just use Photoshop to brighten them up...

Will wait for your pics!!
6
WT article covering 587 and the missing 20 years?
by UnConfused in
1. watchtower
2. bible
published in the last two or three years,please and thank you..
ILoveTTATT

I would also recommend you see this:

*** w65 1/1 p. 29 The Rejoicing of the Wicked Is Short-lived ***
Amel-Marduk (Evil-merodach) as the oldest son succeeded Nebuchadnezzar to the throne in 581 B.C.E

and a major contradiction in the same article... a paragraph or two later:

*** w65 1/1 p. 29 The Rejoicing of the Wicked Is Short-lived ***
Evil-merodach reigned two years and was murdered by his brother-in-law Neriglissar, who reigned for four years, which time he spent mainly in building operations. His underage son Labashi-Marduk, a vicious boy, succeeded him, and was assassinated within nine months. Nabonidus, who had served as governor of Babylon and who had been Nebuchadnezzar’s favorite son-in-law, took the throne and had a fairly glorious reign until Babylon fell in 539 B.C.E.

Do the math...

539 --> ??? (When Nabonidus started reigning)...

The insight book says:

*** it-2 p. 457 Nabonidus ***

On the basis of cuneiform texts he is believed to have ruled some 17 years (556-539 B.C.E.)

So now we have Nabonidus at 556.

Then the previous ruler ruled for 9 months. Let's make it 556 still.

Next ruler for 4 years, 560

Next ruler for 2 years, 562. (With ruling years, give or take one, it could be 561)

But the beginning of the article says 581!

There is a lie of the JW's in the same article!!

BUSTED!!
6
Bokeh - The art of the blur
by ILoveTTATT in
1. social
2. entertainment
a lot of times, when people look at pictures taken by a point-and-shoot vs an slr, they know something is different, but just can't pinpoint exactly what it is.... it is the shallower depth of field.... see.

http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?id=109.

abiblestudent said he likes pictures with large apertures and black-and-white.
ILoveTTATT

Thanks!!
37
Photography and HDR
by ILoveTTATT in
1. social
2. entertainment
as i have mentioned before, i love photography, and specially a technique called hdr.

hdr stands for high dynamic range, and it means the ratio of the "lightness" of the lightest spot in the picture to the darkest.. .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/high-dynamic-range_imaging.
ILoveTTATT

Hi BOTR,

Digital nowadays is amazing!! (Of course, depending on how much $$$ you want to shell out for a camera).

Movies nowadays are being shot using DSLR's... They're THAT good...

With an SLR you can have full control over the F-stops, the aperture, the ISO, etc... everything!

You can avoid the HDR imaging just by using a filter, but it's another technique I have to learn...
6
Bokeh - The art of the blur
by ILoveTTATT in
1. social
2. entertainment
a lot of times, when people look at pictures taken by a point-and-shoot vs an slr, they know something is different, but just can't pinpoint exactly what it is.... it is the shallower depth of field.... see.

http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?id=109.

abiblestudent said he likes pictures with large apertures and black-and-white.
ILoveTTATT

A lot of times, when people look at pictures taken by a point-and-shoot vs an SLR, they know something is different, but just can't pinpoint exactly what it is...

It is the shallower depth of field...

See

http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=109

ABibleStudent said he likes pictures with large apertures and black-and-white. Well... I don't have many photographs like that, but I have some close-ups that I think are very good:
37
Photography and HDR
by ILoveTTATT in
1. social
2. entertainment
as i have mentioned before, i love photography, and specially a technique called hdr.

hdr stands for high dynamic range, and it means the ratio of the "lightness" of the lightest spot in the picture to the darkest.. .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/high-dynamic-range_imaging.
ILoveTTATT

Hehehe I should start selling these!! =P