From the newspaper:
A WOMAN who was abused from the age of four by a senior
officer of the Jehovah’s Witnesses has lodged a 500,00 claim for compensation
in a test case that could open the door to hundreds more suits involving
members of the religious organization in the UK.
Judges sitting at the High Court in London have been told
that Abigail (not her real name) was first molested after Bible-study classes
in Leicestershire by Peter Stewart, a ministerial servant of the organization.
The abuse which included the alleged rape, continued for
five years until Abigail was nine, and took place in her home, his home, in a
shed and in cars, the court was told.
Lawyers and AO Advocates, which is representing her, have
worked closely with the lawyers of an American woman, Candace Conti, to bring
the case. Three years ago Conti was awarded $28m, the biggest religious
sex-abuse payout for a single victim, after revealing that the Jehovah’s
Witnesses had allowed one of its adult members to abuse her as a child.
“I brought the case because I wanted them to be sorry and I
wanted them to change,” Abigail, now 29, told The Sunday Times last week in her
first interview. She has since left the Jehovah’s Witnesses.
“They are a very insular organization. Any change to
children’s lives is going to have to come from outside pressure. I tried for
years to get an apology. It was degrading having to beg for an apology and I
did not get one.”
The religious organization which Abigail’s lawyer, Kathleen
Hallisey, describes as “male-dominated”, required girls to wear dresses, which
made the abuse of Abigail easier, the court was told.
Stewart gave the little girl Quality Street chocolates and
led her to believe that when Armageddon came she would not be saved because of
their “fornication”. Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that the end of the world is immanent.
In 1995 Stewart was convicted of assaulting another child
and sent to prison for five years. When he emerged, Abigail, terrified the
abuse might resume, told the police about her own ordeal and Stewart was
arrested and charged. He died in 2001 before the case came to trial.
Abigail said that she went to court for compensation because
of the response of the senior members in the organization to whom she
complained.
She claims that, following Stewart’s release, she went to
the organization’s elders but was told that, “Because there was not a second
witness to the abuse”, he would be reinstated as a ministerial servant.
Eventually she confided in her husband, who urged her to take legal action.
“I want them to change and to change some of their
practices, too. I would never have gone to court if I had had an apology,” she
said.
“Victims of abuse are made to confront their perpetrators. I
do not understand how this organization can organize meetings between
perpetrators and victims. It is criminal that that is being done. That should
stop. They also have a rule that there have to be two witnesses to abuse and they
must be of good character.
“Abuse is regarded as a sin, not a crime. I want this to
change to protect other children in the future.”
Lawyers suggested that the situation was reminiscent of that
in the Catholic Church, with widespread abuse unreported to police.
“We expect this case to open the floodgates to dozens, if
not hundreds, more cases,” said Hallisey. The firm already has six other
clients who are awaiting the outcome of Abigail’s case before deciding whether
to go to court.
Jehovah’s Witnesses as a Christian organization whose
members are best known for preaching door-to-door and distributing religious
literature such as The Watchtower and Awake! magazines. They are understood to
be considering setting up high-street drop-in centers and have also recently
started canvassing at Tube stations.
Abigail has found it difficult to hold down a job for long,
did not complete a university education and suffers from a post-traumatic
stress disorder. She has made several suicide attempts and told her lawyers she
did not expect to live past the age of 30. It has affected me in every way,”
she said. “It has changed who I would have been.”
A spokesman for the Jehovah’s Witnesses said: “While deeply sympathizing
with any victims of abuse, we do not consider it appropriate to comment on a
case where a ruling by the judge is still pending. “Jehovah’s Witness have an
absolute and unequivocal abhorrence of child abuse. The care and safeguarding
of children is extremely important to us. For decades we have published
material to help parents and children to be protected from abuse.”