Posts by Jayson

9

I would really like to know

by Jayson in

since the antius/bush crowd is so sure of itself and it's sources what did saddam do with is wmd and where it was done?

i would really like to know.. i mean this is the same crowd that before the us invaded was crying for more time for the un to find the wmd that they now claim do not exist.

they also say that bush masterminded this huge lie.

Jayson

Since the antiUS/Bush crowd is so sure of itself and it's sources what did Saddam do with is WMD and where it was done? I would really like to know.

I mean this is the same crowd that before the US invaded was crying for more time for the UN to find the WMD that they now claim do not exist. They also say that Bush masterminded this huge lie. I thought that he was the "village idiot." Anyway they offer no alternate plan other than a finger in the butt. What did Saddam do with his WMD?

Doesn't this bring back memories of the Regan years with the left? I was in the 3rd grade but I still remember in school being told how bad, how senile Regan was. And how we will all probably die in nuclear war because of him. He was the one who said "Peace Through Strength." I remember the outward hostility and hate from the left. And all the while they claimed to be the victim. We were all doomed. But as it turned out only the evil of the USSR's communism was doomed. Now, look at all the Eastern European countries that are free.

It is being repeated again now with Bush. The good news is we know how it turns out. The death of the evil Islamic Republics are comming, they are doomed.

"Peace Through Strength."

Pass the popcorn please.

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

Thirty-seven per cent thought it right to invade - including 54% of the UK response, 74% of the US response and 79% of the Israeli sample.

... shows where the support for the war came from - doing what the Israeli's want !

This shows another bias Simon. Could it be that the US where 3 out of four people polled by your pollsters say that invasion was the right thing to do along with their policy makers did what they thought was right? Why do you support the idea that the US needs to be told what it can and can't do? Why would we give a hoot what Israel says? (although be it they are a true example of what we should seek in allies.)

You also discount the mass of nations who supported the war and the war effort. I have alread gone over this in your other threads. So in the words of Reborn, I am not going to do your homework for you this time. Also your unwillingness to address my questions (Which shows your inability to look at the facts that do not support you) and your insults instead are quite telling.

Most the world is run by thugs. Not long ago I would say communists and thugs so that they hate us means we must be doing something right. Also "World on Fire" by Amy Chau is worth reading. It is not a pro Bush type book and I think it explains why the world hates the US much better than Simon's thread.-jmho

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

I still say if the world doesn't like the US sticking its nose into their problems, the US government should close its borders, re-start the star wars program, and let the rest of the world deal with the terrorists by themselves.
Mrs. Shakita

Good point. And, that is exactly what is going on. If you are a country that harbors or aides terrorists we will look upon you as the terrorists themselves. And we will distroy the terrorists. The game is over. "With us or with them."

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

Most of the world is very alarmed at the US at the moment. Here we have a huge country, a super power that can actually defeat any other country or combination of countries in the whole world. Many of us feel threatened by this monolith with it's love of guns and it's love of capital punishment. It's almost as though civilised society is being threatened by the Wild Bunch. Many of it's citizens have no concept of a society outside of it's borders, nor will they show the slightest interest in anything that does not fit in with their own concepts of how life should be.

Now Eng be a good little boy and remember to post how you LOVE america and you LOVE americans on your next post like the others do after giving comments like this. With a prejudice like that "fair and balanced" [as Simon claims to be] must be a breeze.

Western Europeans are such an a good example of peaceful folk. Refer to history for an explaination. The US needs to stop and take a good look at who her friends are and who her allies are. Western Europe it ain't. As Eng put it "Americans need to get over 9/11." Clear as mud it is that he and his ilk don't care and never did. I however, will never forget. It's OK Eng we do not need you.

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

Simon,

You are being an idiot over the Iraqi issue.

You are so bias it is pathetic. Also you assured me that you do not show favoritism on this board. That is not true. Searchfortruth has being spewing your AntiUS antiBush mantra link free for as long as this issue has been on the board. You never took any issue of it because it suited your retoric. All I have done is given a different perspective. I put the media bias in focus. What's a matter can't have the other side on the board? That is the truth. Neither you nor any other blind anti-Bushie would bother to look anyway. You say I am a Fox zombie [my words] and I am challenged to show some facts which I do along with very fair questions that are ignored because the answers debunk the left wing media inspired positon that you hold so dearly. You claim that I twist your words and slander you. But it is you that started it all. Also, I think I see what you say in perfect context for what it is. I don't need to take you or anyone else like you out of context to prove my point. You are clear just as you are.

P.S. How is asking you if you have seen the discovery documentary about 9/11 being childish?

P.P.S. If you remember Simon I said that I would so rather talk about my current fishing adventures than all of this. You criticized me for it. You keep resurrecting this issue. You do so with no real reason to accept to make an issue that has been mauled and mulled and chewed to death. And if the postion that I fall into remains silent you guys gloat over the quite. So don't dish it out if you can't take it.

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

Well-Placed Democrats Insisted Saddam Had WMD
by Joseph A. D'Agostino
Posted Jun 16, 2003

In the build-up to the Iraq War, President Bush was not the only U.S. leader insisting Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Democratic senators who were members of the Intelligence, Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees, who had their own access to U.S. intelligence, also insisted Saddam had these weapons.

"Saddam Hussein possesses chemical, biological weapons, and if events are allowed to run their course, will someday possess nuclear weapons."
Sen. Evan Bayh (D.-Ind.)
Intelligence member
Statement, Oct. 3, 2002

"I believe that Saddam Hussein rules by terror and has squirreled away stores of biological and chemical weapon."
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D.-Calif.)
Intelligence member
Floor speech, Oct. 10, 2002

"The people of the United States and the rest of the world are at risk as long as Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction. Last night, the President . . . made the most effective case to date that the risk of inaction is too great to bear."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D.-W.Va.)
Vice Chairman of Intelligence Committee
Statement, March 18, 2003

"For the last 12 years he’s [Saddam’s] ignored U.N. resolutions and embargoes while rebuilding his illegal chemical and biological weapons. . . . He is dangerous. I believe he needs to be disarmed."
Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D.-Md.)
Intelligence member
Floor speech, March 18, 2003

"In 1991, the world collectively made a judgment that this man should not have weapons of mass destruction. And we are here today in the year 2002 with an un-inspected four-year interval during which time we know through intelligence he not only has kept them, but he continues to grow them... .The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new."
Sen. John Kerry (D.-Mass.)
Foreign Relations member
Floor speech, Oct. 9, 2002

"On Monday night, President Bush, I think spoke for all of us. I know of no one who really disagrees at all. He described Saddam Hussein as a homicidal dictator who is addicted to weapons of mass destruction. It is that addiction that demands a strong response. We all agree on that. There is no question that Iraq possesses biological and chemical weapons and that he seeks to acquire additional weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons."
Sen. Chris Dodd (D.-Conn.)
Foreign Relations member
Floor speech, Oct. 9, 2002

"I believe if Saddam Hussein continues to refuse to meet his obligation to destroy his weapons of mass destruction and his prohibited missile delivery systems, that the United Nations should authorize member states to use military force to destroy those weapons and systems."
Sen. Carl Levin (D.-Mich.)
then-chairman of Armed Services
and member of Intelligence
Floor speech, Oct. 9, 2002

"He [Saddam Hussein] stockpiles biological and chemical weapons."
Sen. Jon Corzine (D.-N.J.)
Foreign Relations member
Floor speech, Oct. 9, 2003
Joseph D'Agostino is Associate Editor of HUMAN EVENTS.

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

David A. Keene

U.N. should move to Paris and get into Chirac's bed

June 10, 2003

President Bush is trying his best to let the French know that he leads a magnanimous nation -- one that's willing, to an extent at least, to let bygones be bygones. After all, we managed to win the war in Iraq even without Jacques Chirac's assistance and are used to the fact that the French are prone to act as they do. But it's tough. Bush might have to be nice to the man, but the rest of us don't. The French president didn't just oppose the United States on Iraq in the United Nations; he was an accessory before, during and after the fact in Iraq. France had good reason to oppose our policies out of pure self-interest. The billions of dollars in lucrative contracts held before the war by French concerns were directly traceable to the goodwill of Saddam Hussein. Chirac had no incentive to try to be part of the solution to the crisis in Iraq for the very simple reason that he and his buddies were part of the problem.

His concern for peace, justice and the European Union's (EU) way has been demonstrated time and time again over the last few years. As if defending Saddam Hussein were not enough, in the midst of all this, he welcomed Robert Mugabe, the dictator-cum-thug who rules or tries to rule Zimbabwe, to France in a desperate attempt to curry favor with the man by legitimizing him when most world leaders were suggesting that he is no longer fit company for anyone who claims to be civilized. Zimbabwe, once an exporter of food to the rest of Africa is today a nation whose people are starving and dying thanks to the policies and tender mercies of this "friend" of Chirac's.

Mugabe may be a racist and he may send thugs out to beat up his opposition while denying Zimbabweans who aren't able to prove their loyalty to him and his party access to the humanitarian aid we send to his country, but he is also a friend of France and the political correctness for which Chirac is fighting.

Thus, Mugabe has turned down more than 10,000 tons of American grain in the past year to show solidarity with France and the EU's "moratorium" on importing genetically modified food products. Other nations have also banned importation of grains from the United States because they fear that if they accept or purchase such products from us, the EU will retaliate by banning their products from Europe.

Mugabe doesn't have to worry about being shut out of Europe, of course, because his nation can no longer feed itself, but he does crave the prestige of being counted a buddy of Chirac.

Now, it turns out Chirac has another new idea that has the advantages of being targeted against the United States and might produce monies that could be used to purchase French products for transshipment to starving Africans and others. It will be cheered by the politically correct and is at heart no sillier than some of his other suggestions.

Consider this one: Chirac is suggesting an international tax on the sale of guns to individual citizens to create what a Brazilian supporter of the scheme describes as a "global fund capable of giving food to those who are hungry and for creating conditions to end the causes of hunger." Reports coming out of the G8 Summit say Chirac favors the tax on individual purchases because he doesn't want to tax firearms manufacturers (some of which are French) and because the bulk of the money thus raised would come from "wealthy" U.S. citizens who are, after all, about the only individuals around who have a legal right to buy guns. It would, of course, be administered by the United Nations.

This new scheme seems very attractive to Chirac and would allow the U.N. to further both its desire to ban the purchase and ownership of arms and find a way to impose an international tax that would allow member nations to get directly into the pockets of the people of this country. What an idea.

I dug my old "get the U.S. out of the U.N." bumper strips out of a box in the garage some time ago and I'm ready to put one on my car. This is an organization that should meet in Paris, where its friends reside and where the heads of member states not welcome here can go to sip chardonnay with Chirac while their people starve.

203

Poll suggests world hostile to US

by Simon in

an interesting read:.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.

some key bits:.

Jayson

Asked who is the more dangerous to world peace and stability, the United States was rated higher than al-Qaeda by respondents in both Jordan (71%) and Indonesia (66%).

And this shows just how out of touch these people are. Also just how bias this "poll" is. It is irrelevent.

208

The kind of Man GWBush is.

by Yerusalyim in

at walter reed medical center in washington dc recently the sergeant major of the army, jack tilley, was with a group of people visiting the wounded soldiers.

he saw a special forces soldier who had lost his right hand and suffered severe wounds of his face and side of his body.

the sma wanted to honor him and show him respect without offending, but what can you say or do in such a situation that will encourage and uplift?

Jayson

Thanks for the thread Yeru. Copied and sent to those who will pass it on.

Thanks again.

33

Are You In The Real World What You Seem To Be Here?

by minimus in

jw
friends

in all honesty, are you pretty much like you are at home or in the workplace when you post here?

i wonder whether or not you are the same personality in person as you are here on the internet board.......i'm very much the same only i don't ask people questions in real life.

but my basic personality and wonderful wit is always there.

Jayson

Mini I swear you have done one like this if not this before. Anyway, I AM who I AM.