Well. I'm already had a wee smoke before bedtime, and was going to bed, but in honour I'll roll another one...
... and wonder if the conspiracy behind threads discussing drugs mysteriously disappearing is run by aliens or Illuminati...
accepted origin
, high times magazine, the marijuana-logues, and the straight dope claim that in the early 1970s, a group of teenagers at san rafael high school in san rafael, california used to meet every day after school at 4:20 p.m. to smoke marijuana at the water tower.
one piece of evidence supporting an origin of the term from the time 4:20 is the fact that the number is always said "four twenty" and not "four hundred twenty.
Well. I'm already had a wee smoke before bedtime, and was going to bed, but in honour I'll roll another one...
... and wonder if the conspiracy behind threads discussing drugs mysteriously disappearing is run by aliens or Illuminati...
i think you will find this interesting and maybe even eye-opening.
look up brigitte on google.
an amazing woman who has suffered at the hands of muslims for being a christian and knows whereof she speaks.
stilljw, what you ignore in your eagerness to attack Islam is (I assume you know);
You were a cultist and are still a jw; I realise the two aren't the same. Don't become a bigot, you're probably far too nice a guy to do that to yourself. If you finger point another faith without looking at your own or others, that is the risk you run. Mote, beam, speck, rafter; not you personally, but Christianity.
my closes friend asked me today if her and her husband should just go ahead and write a letter of disassociation or wait to be df.
many months ago i talked with them about 607, etc.
all the things i was finding out.
First of all, don't play by their rules.
If you join a childhood club with friends based on imaginary stuff, you don't write a letter saying you are dissassociating yourself from the Tutfty Club when you 'grow-up'. Unless it suits YOU and your intentions, why should one DA because it's expected? Yes, expected by whom, and why should one care what they think now?
I walked away, managed to avoid DF'ing, and decided to just let it be as I thought it the best way of staying on good relations with my family. It suited me.
Might not suit them. But it's another option.
even if all else looks bad, due to the fact that jw's preach the goodnews of the kingdom in harmony with matt 28, doesn't this make them the true religion since technically no other religion can make this claim?
garybuss
Yes. And beautifully put.
Shining One
Oh hello you.
>Anyone who follows a god that says 'Worship me or i'll KILL you' is as far from the TRUTH as the earth is from the sun.You are talking about the cult teaching, right?
Nice to know you sometimes can see something that walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck is in all probability a duck.
Now if you mean that the Bible teaches that, you are absolutely wrong. All souls live on after the physical realm is traversed. There are two possibilities, 'smoking or non-smoking'.
Oh this is fun. First of all the caring sharing Christian love just coming out at you. I didn't know imitating Christ involved Dennis Leary meets Pat Robinson style stand-up. How... refreshing. And oh, for those of you who do know how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, the additional hair-splitting between the ceasing of a consciousness and the eternal torment of a consciousness. Nice.
What is reality? Is it the physical realm we inhabit now or the afterlife where our souls will reside for eternity?
The former is provable, the latter is unfounded speculation you have no more proof of than someone who believes Thor makes thunder.
>The Bible doesnt contain any TRUTH, if anything it distracts consciousness from what is actual, real and true!Really? How can you KNOW that? Prove your assertion.
Nuuuurh... we do not have to share your presupposition the Bible is true - the very error the person who starts this thread seems to make. I mean, what use is it saying you have the right oil filters for your car as you have a manual if you have a manual for the wrong car? As we do not have to share your presupposition, for your opinion to be worth a tinkers damn in this regard you have to prove the Bible is accurate. Which so far you have failed to do quite spectacularly. The number of people you put off with your opinion regarding the Bible's meaning and validity I couldn't devangelise in a month of Sundays. You are the one making the assertion, silly. Prove it.
I'm glad the treatment is going well and you've got some Internet hours back in previldges...
from http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v9i11f.htm
the secret $1,000,000 prize
one of the best kept secrets of science is the origin of life prize sponsored by the origin of life foundation, inc. when we first ran across their web site (www.lifeorigin.org), we thought that the offer of one million dollars to anyone who could propose a plausible theory for the origin of life was just a slick creationist trick for showing that the emperor had no clothes.
slacker911
Good to see you here too; now go to your room, you've been a naughty boy poor hooby-wooby got a boo-boo.
One of the most wonderful things about people of such a mindset is that they set themselves up to be ridiculed by their own actions. It's almost enough to restore one's faith in human nature.
Reminds me of weebles, those little egg-shaped toy people that don't fall over. It's not like the fact it keeps on popping back up no matter how hard it gets whacked means it is tough or smart; it's a senseless lump of plastic.
But, as has been pointed out, more people get a grounding in why Creationism is ignorant supersticious nonsense from threads like this than would otherwise happen. We could write posts about evolutionary biology all day that wouldn't appeal to those most in need of the information they contained.
Hooberus and those like him unwittingly provide fantastic opportunities to correct the misconceptions about and distortions of evolutionary biology such vulnerable ones have, as they are more likely to be attracted to threads defending what they have been conditioned to believe.
I firmly believe most realise through such discussions just how wrong and deceptive the arguments used by Creationists and ID-ots are. It's just a tad amusing that Creationists et. al don't realise the best thing they could do is avoid such discussions, as they are entirely counter-productive to their goals.
.
where in the scriptures do we find that a persons spirituality is judged by how many meetings, how many field service hours and comments one makes?
(this is practiced in the congregations in case you didnt know)
steve2
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of something like that as a reply... I was going for '12 inches of throbbing spirituality', but decided against it as it sounds like something off a Dubbie MySpace profile...
from http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v9i11f.htm
the secret $1,000,000 prize
one of the best kept secrets of science is the origin of life prize sponsored by the origin of life foundation, inc. when we first ran across their web site (www.lifeorigin.org), we thought that the offer of one million dollars to anyone who could propose a plausible theory for the origin of life was just a slick creationist trick for showing that the emperor had no clothes.
I'll listen to those worshipping their literal interpretation of accounts written by Bronze Age pastoralists (that modern science falsifies) chuntering on about abiogenesis with considerably more interest after they present a theory of abiogodesis that doesn't involve unprovable assertions (god is outside this Universe and the laws don't apply/god has always been here and had no beginning).
Without a theory to validate their own beliefs they act as if the lack of a definitive theory of abiogenesis actually means their beliefs are correct. It is idiotically simplistic thinking, and is identical in its validity to the beliefs held by those religionists who still worship rocks and put bones through their noses.
hooberus, you are accused by myself and others of using this board to try and get to those recovering from a cult before they have developed the thinking skills to see that you are merely another species of cultist on a recruitment drive, and now want moderator protection for your modus operandi. This is not an insult, it is demonstrable fact using your own posts.
By your endorsement of cult recruitment websites, you obviously support the vastly inflated salaries paid to their executives in comparison to comparable charities, and yet whilst supporting such profiteering using poor science and omission of facts as tools to deceive, you get snitty if your actions are referred to in the language they deserve. This is not an insult, it is demonstrable fact using your own posts.
Your morals are severely screwed up; shame on you. If selling drugs within so many yards of a school is wronger than selling it away from a school, your actions are clearly more contemptible than innocent debate as you have an active agenda targeting the vulnerable carried out in a locale of little direct relevance to your own life.
Call the disgusting thing by it's name I say.
i do not agree with your reading of "policy".
i base this on personal experience on a couple of fronts.
1. i have yet to come across a single verifiable of a cover up.
Ditto to the comment's that the poster is showing classical black-white thinking;
About stealing, maybe I'm a victim of my upbringing
You got that right.
but I do not believe it is acceptable to steal even to feed your family. There are other, legal ways to do so. I don't accept that there is no other way.
Outside of blinkered thinking one can easily see some people do encounter situations where there only way to feed their family is theft, even if you are in a place where this is not a likely eventuality due to the existence of various charities et.al. Other people aren't so lucky, but you obviously are not thinking about other people.
I believe that any injustice can be corrected without resorting to theft, lying or any other form of dishonesty.
In addition to this showing your naivety, legal fact shows that you are wrong. Sometime an organisation or person will be engaged in illegal activity or the support and/or solicitation of illegal activity, or otherwise engaged in activity which will violate the rights of others. To technically violate law or positions of trust in order to disclose such actions is RIGHT, and in
what's to stop you from stealing when you will profit from it? Or lie when it serves your interests?
Distortion of the case at hand. It has NOTHING to do with personal interests, but is a matter where the public have a right to know.
Of course, if the Borg practised judicial control as per the Bible (in public 'by the gates of the city'), then 'unauthorised' disclosure would not be necessary. It is the secrecy (which is Biblically unsupportable) which makes it necessary.
When do you stop defending the indefensible?
.
where in the scriptures do we find that a persons spirituality is judged by how many meetings, how many field service hours and comments one makes?
(this is practiced in the congregations in case you didnt know)
It's like the bit in Dead Poet's Society, where Robin Williams' character lampoons the assigned text's introduction for stating that a poem's worth can be plotted on a graph with 'Truth' on one axis and 'Beauty' on the other...
people everywhere listen ; lead a revolt!
go to a memorial when they pass round the bread and wine (or "flesh" and "bllood" if you prefer) get back to me to tell me what you think, or if you are brave enough the results of the dare!
abbadette.
Her avater is a cat's eye... man, you should avoid ink-blot tests!