Whilst the arguments about global warming and the evidence that may support it will rage for some time, I think one could reach an easier consensus on the evidence supporting 'global atheisming' and 'global secularising'.
Plot the trend. Consider the factors causing this trend; outside of cult-like thinking and totalitarian religious regimes, it can only become more pronounced.
Look also at how secularism is also increasing outside of those same areas.
The percentage of population who are in cult-like thinking and totalitarian religious regimes is quite small.
In the rest of the world, secularisation and increasing atheism are givens.
Of course cult-like thinking and totalitarian religious regimes will resist this, are resisting this. Be it through driving explosive-filled Jeeps into airports or by seeking to impose their own faith-based beliefs on others.
It will pass. We don't burn witches much anymore, we are getting better, "the slow curve of humanity IS towards justice". And the slow extinction of religion is not the end of spirituality or good.
I think licencing religions is a great idea, but a bit like teaching your cat to use the a toilet. Okay, it's possible, but...
I think a much better idea is to make sure education is such that the harmful effects of religious belief are moderated, helping the move towards secularism.
done4good
In the USA, it is still easier to really become succussful, (in the monetary sense), if one takes the initiative.
Actually, in Europe, a greater percentage of people own 20% of the wealth. So one could say in Europe it is easier to become wealthy, as more people do, and in the US it is easier to become extremely rich, as there are fewer sharing the 20% of wealth.
Now, which society do you want to live in?
metatron
Doing something that leads to societal benefits is still a good idea even if some people impose their agenda upon it. If welfare states tend to better distribution of wealth (fact), reduction of intrasocietal tensions and a correspondingly more peaceful society (fact) and a reduction of poverty and harm caused by poverty (fact), why stop it because some idiots think they deserve it? There's lots of white 'Christian' welfare scroungers (those who could work but don't) who think they deserve it. Why stop because some of them are Muslim?