AcapulcoGold
JoinedPosts by AcapulcoGold
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
sf - thanks and you're dead right.
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
hi darkclouds - in answer to your question - if i'm comprehending it correctly (please advise me if i'm not)
it isn't the screenname that provides a clue as to the moles real identity
- it's their screen persona or story if you will that is incongruous with their online activity
i chose to use the example of the screen persona of a mother earlier for two reasons,
1) i was looking at the tattoo on my left shoulder whilst thinking of my response
2) as with any form of espionage - the innocuous always creates the least suspect facade for purposes of counterintelligence.
multiple personality posting diffuses brooklyn mole control - that's why the brooklyn moles make such an issue of it, they are aware of the impressiveness & effectiveness of multiple personality posting accusations against "the enemy" -
as a means of gaining "allies" amongst the still vulnerable feeble minded xjw's who frequent these message boards
in conjunction with my response to the strategic genius farkle above i hope this answers your question darkclouds.
by the way pleased to hear you're me, i was goo last ride on the accusation merry go round - oh to be accused of being a scholar .............
sf - thanks and you're dead right.
-
62
The Natural Law fallacy and Homosexuality
by JanH inthere is a fallacy of logic that is so common that few people realize that it is, indeed, a fallacy of logic: the fallacy by appeal to nature.. one argument against homosexuality goes something like this:.
the natural use of the reproductive organs is obviously to make children.
using these organs in a way that cannot produce children is unnatural and thus ethically wrong.. .
-
-
AcapulcoGold
mommy - hi guys , how's the shift going?
janh - one of these days you're going to surprise us all and add some humour, wit, charm, intelligence and originality to one of your posts
- in the meantime, i'm not holding my breath
yours
mommie dark
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
expat:
Gosh, so Mommy is a WATCHTOWER SPY!!!
your assumption and no one elses - dont try and finger paint me as the one making it please.
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
darkclouds & joelbear another way to spot the brooklyn "real" moles - is that they have a tendency to overreact when the heat gets a little close to home - if you know what I mean.
-
62
The Natural Law fallacy and Homosexuality
by JanH inthere is a fallacy of logic that is so common that few people realize that it is, indeed, a fallacy of logic: the fallacy by appeal to nature.. one argument against homosexuality goes something like this:.
the natural use of the reproductive organs is obviously to make children.
using these organs in a way that cannot produce children is unnatural and thus ethically wrong.. .
-
-
AcapulcoGold
ROTFLMAO
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
joel bear - yea - interesting observation - but posters like fred, you know etc are the brooklyn decoy moles or doubleagent moles - plants to distract from the real plants - dummy plants - more "philosophie de pt barnum" - you gotta credit the brooklyn boys - they're still dumb enough to know most of the "smart" exjws on these boards will fall for this kind of "obviously a jw" decoy mole every time
while the nice "antijw" moles go about the real job of turning these message boards into online policestates unnoticed where no TRULY original ideas are allowed to be posted
hugs acapulcogold
-
50
what would you do. . .
by dark clouds inif this happened to you?.
sitting behind my computer a few mornings ago, i was doing the share of reading that i do on a daily basis, sipping my coffee, minding my own, when an instant message appeared on my screen.
call it second nature, i responded as i usually do.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
darkclouds fyi:
it's common knowledge that there's brooklyn moles all over these kinds of boards trying to "discourage" anyone who doesn't agree with these places becoming online kingdom halls
brooklyn plants virtual elders (moles) posing as either sex to watchdog the sites against any intrusions against it by independent thinking
one of the ways you can identify these brooklyn moles is by observing over a period of time a strange incongruity between the moles online persona and the amount of hours they actually spend online.
sounds like you're just finding this out my boy
as you say, you've noticed this discrepancy -
for example someone may be posing as a mother and yet over a period of time, by say "comparing notes" with other posters around the world - you may discover this "mother" spends about 18 hours a day on the board.
dumb ploy i know but as we're all aware the boys at brooklyn are wholesale subscribers to the "philosophie de pt barnum"
here's the dope - the brooklyn mole is in fact not a mole but moles - plural - a group of brooklyn bros whose "theocratic assignment" consists of rostered shifts patrolling these sites.
there will always be at least a minimum of two brooklyn moles planted per site - facilitating monitoring of the site 24 hours a day whilst maintaining the facade of a semblance of normal routine in the "lives" of their online personas.
it's common practice for the moles - if the anti virtual kingdom hall authors on the site have it - to invade that authors privacy via instant messenger and or email - to try and "persuade" them a little from the course of their errant ways.
welcome to the real world darkclouds.
acapulcogold
-
8
APOSTATE TRAINING COMPLETED
by goo inguys i'm happy to report that the following authors have graduated from the goo's apostates apostate dont feed the trolls training academy:.
mummy .
tina.
-
-
AcapulcoGold
Hey goo why aren't I on the list?