The evidence is clear that Jehovah is leaving his name on the modern-day organization.
If the evidence is so clear, then where is it? What is it? You make such a bold statement as if the truth of it is obvious, and it is not. You mention none of that evidence that is supposedly so clear.
Actually, the opposite is clear to me - that the org is not backed by a superhuman, just being. The organization has a history literally over a hundred years long of major failed predictions, deception, corruption, looney teachings, etc.
It is an embarrassment today. The governing body members come across as clueless buffoons on broadcasts. The org is weakening. It has become cowardly, televangelist-like, shallow, dumbed down, overly concerned with money.
The preaching is weakening at a time when, according to JW theology, it should be growing and strengthening. JWs (the org as a whole and individual JWs) run from challenges and deep questions. The little bit of preaching work that is done is a faint whisper and is unclear and filled with fluff. Most humans are not aware of what the main JW beliefs are. JWs have not preached the message as it is claimed. Even back when the preaching work was far stronger than today, it was puny. The majority of JWs were not qualified to teach and preach. When I was a regular pioneer, I used to cringe when I heard other JWs witnessing in the field. It would be extremely unjust for a supreme being to destroy most of earth's population based on the puny, unclear, ineffective preaching of JWs. I find it difficult to believe that you believe that the end of the whole world is imminent and that JWs are doing a satisfactory job of warning of such. Do you really believe that JWs are like the Israelites marching around Jericho giving a great shout that everybody hears?
And, concerning the UN thing... The situation is far more serious than you make it out to be. It wasn't just "Oh, let's fill out a card so we can have access to research materials." I was a zealous regular pioneer when it happened, but was unaware of it at the time. However, at the time, I was aware that the org published pro-UN material in at least one of the mags. My wife and my sister and I all read the articles and were baffled. We discussed our being baffled at the time. We thought the UN was part of Satan's political system, and the org was publishing material putting it in a favorable light??? Now that I know what happened behind the scenes, it all makes sense. In order to be an NGO, the org had to promote the UN. To this day, my wife and I remember those articles and are pissed off about the situation.