Some terms Dawkins used that stuck in my head and cause me to feel uncomfortable.
uneducated churchgoer, Holocaust denier, evolution denier, history denier
I feel uncomfortable at the way Dawkins is grouping people together, and labelling them. Many may think it is fine and see the need to do this. But I would disagree with those people.
An uneducated churchgoer, can be a child from 0-18, or an 80 yr old who left education at 14 as they needed to work. Not knowing much about evolution for them is no big deal IMO. Evolution is an area of interest, that many pursue and many do not. I don't think it matter's what the uneducated churchgoer thinks. They are the most vulnerable in the congregation, their physical needs are the most important IMO.
I have never met a Holocaust denier in my life! A Holocaust denier IMO, is a racist, anti-semite, who is politically active and dangerous to the local community. Their motives for denying the Holocaust are driven by hatred, they are likely to be very intelligent and couldn't care less about the topic of evolution IMO. But I haver never met one.
Evolution denier/history denier. I have met plenty of course I am a DF'd JW. Dawkins writing style is very persuasive in making his point that it is important that this group of people are taken seriously and stamped out. He writes in a way that it is damaging to society to deny evolution. He even uses the term, "I aspire to arm those that are not history deniers-but know some"Not only did this make me feel uncomfortable, IMO it is down right creepy and reminds me of Eph 6:10-20 Where the apostle Paul wants the reader to gear up for a preaching battle.
Hopefully many who respect Dawkins, can understand why I feel the way I do. I am only reading this book because someone who I respect wants me to. I am really trying to be open minded about Dawkins, and will continue to read two more chapters as promised. I will not continue reading his books as I don't enjoy his writing style.
Books are to be enjoyed. Love to you all Kate xx