KateWild

Joined

• started 154 topics
• posted 6,385 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by KateWild

• 
  15

  Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  only assertions that can be proven scientifically, empirically or logically should be accepted as true.. kate xx.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Apogs, you make some good points. Flexible thinking there. We all need to be flexible thinkers as we exit WT wouldn't you agree? So many JWs are rigid thinkers and we need to realise this when we exit.

  Kate xx
• 
  26

  Help please!!!

  by braincleaned in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my mom just hung up on me, convinced that the borg has never said that jesus was not the mediator between the sheep and him!.

  i know they have presumptuously took the place of jesus as mediators can someone pleeeeeeze give me the wt references of this?.

  she does not believe me..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Hey Vince,

  Glad you got what you needed so quickly. Sorry to see you're having problems with your mum. I hope you get it sorted soon.

  Take care Kate xx
• 
  15

  Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  only assertions that can be proven scientifically, empirically or logically should be accepted as true.. kate xx.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Only assertions that can be proven scientifically, empirically or logically should be accepted as true.

  Kate xx
• 
  42

  Lawrence Krauss

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  krauss is an atheist activist and self-described antitheist.

  hence his science is biased.

  being an antitheist means he's anti god.. anyone disagree?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  This is misleading. It turned out that it is flat.-cofty

  Hahahaha for now. they could change their minds again. How about the earth? It was flat first and then spherical. But to an ant the earth is flatKate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Resorting to god-did-it is what people do who don't want a real answer.-cofty

  What's the real answer then cofty?
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  What do you consider making a claim if it's not "I think X because of reasons Y and Z"? You just made three incorrect claims about me, one of what I need, one of what I understand and one my emotional state, all ignorant of actual information. - Viv

  hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!! There you go again mister. Off topic remarks. I have not made claims I have given you my opinion about you since you don't want to tell me your true motives. You whole post is like a firring squad of stupid questions merely designed as an attack. It's an example of you being confrontational and aggressive in a way that I find unhelpful to most posters here. You are being willfully ignorant of my perspective just to try an annoy me on purpose.

  It's Friday night here in the UK I have better things to do than play on my computer with you Viv. I did have some fun though we could have some real fun if I come and visit you in Texas mister Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Grasping at straws.-cofty

  Lol!!! perhaps for you. Hence my conclusion. It's all a matter of perspective cofty. I listened to Krauss BTW, not bad. Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Would you please explain, what is a "creator" for you? Exactly what difference or how important this "creator" is?-MG

  The Creator is a deity responsible for the creation of the world, cosmos and universe. Important to me becase I like to know how things work and believing a creator is responsible fuels my enquirey that one day I might get some concrete proof either way of his existence. But for now I believe until I am proved otherwise.

  Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Great on sunday afternoons usually live music and london old fashioned charm.-galaxie

  Are you in London too, are you going to come for a meetup?

  Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv,

  In my opinion having a conclusion, is not making a claim, having a belief is not making a claim. I have expressed multiple times that the evidence is soley for me not proof to anyone else. But I can understand why you can't grasp any of what I am saying, you need concrete facts to satisfy your curiosity and you get irritated when you don't have any concrete proof.

  I on the other hand have the ability to make higher order abstractions and that's part of my thinking process. To understand this you have to think out of the box Viv. Hydrogen bonds should not be possible in nature, but they are there, hydrogen and oxygen do not bond like this in organic molecules. This is an example of a guided process to me, but perhaps not to another chemical analyst. I am satisfied this process is guided by God, other chemical analysts may not be. They may think it's a natural process.

  So in conclusion science in the case of hydrogen bonds proves nothing as reagrds to the existence of God

  Kate xx