You are not in agreement with much of what science has discovered.-Qcmbr
You haven't read all my posts, met me or discussed chemistry with me. Why do you draw this conclusion?
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
You are not in agreement with much of what science has discovered.-Qcmbr
You haven't read all my posts, met me or discussed chemistry with me. Why do you draw this conclusion?
when this guy calls his boss to tell him hes running a little late, he witnesses a car accident and begins the best play-by-play commentary youll ever hear.. http://95rockfm.com/best-voicemail-giving-play-by-play-of-car-accident/.
Typical sterotype old ladies. They are foolhardy, good on 'em I say. Thanks for that
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
Qcmbr,
You quote mined me. Why do I want to understand particle physics better?
Its a cycle for me. Learn something----->understand a little----->desire to learn more------->Faith fits in at all pointsnts of my cycle------> Learn something new.
Kate xx
COC. The only one. Kate xx
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
So without faith you wouldn't have any interest in science? Wow- Qcmbr
Nope. Putting words in my mouth. Actually I am interested in God and science. I have faith that is a fact, talking about my interests with out faith is irelevant and pointless. Take care love Kate xx
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
Are you SBF in disguise? - cofty
That is just a matter of perspective LOL! Kate xx
this site is not a healthy forum for discussion or healing.
its an arena for jaded athiests to bash anything christian or god related.
yes, i know the jw's lied to us about god and the truth.
Nope, just love, and worship done with spirit and truth.-SFPW
Which KH do you go to? It's a bit different round here lovey. Take care Kate xx
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
I think that sometimes he still over eggs the anti-religious pudding but I can seperate that from his documentation of science.-K99
I do agree, and I am also trying to overlook this and imitate you example K99, I feel validated you understand my perspective. It's easier to press on when posters don't pretened that there is no elephant in the room as it were. - Kate xx
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
Kate - please describe how faith / religion investigates truth? Qcmbr
For me my faith leads me to investigate science. How so? I learned a little about sub-atomic particles and how they work. I am in awe of what I have already learned. I dont understand Shrodingers Wave equation, but because of how complex and wounderful sub-atomic particles are, I want to understand particle physics better, I feel it draws me closer to God as a creator and that is my motive to investigate science.
I want to draw away from talking in terms of false and true, learning more about a topic that interests me is my goal.
Kate xx
i have to say, i am afraid i found this chapter labourious to read in most places.
imo i felt he just wasn't getting to the point.
i don't get why dawkins felt the need to teach me all about platoism, essentialism and rabbits.
Science will march on regardless of the debates and will continue to discover how this reality works. Faith and religion never will since they all lack a means to approach and evaluate knowledge-Qcmbr
I am afraid I disagree, Einstein's religious beliefs fuelled his desire to investigate science. He made wonderful discoveries because of his faith. Faith and religion don't stop everyone from making scientific discoveries. I find people stop moving forward in science, because they are more interested in other topics. IMO it's not always about faith and religion.
In Dawkin's case IMO it's religion that drives him, but just from the opposite perspective. He wants to educate the uneducated churgoer.
Kate xx