Viv, Priceless!!!!!! hahahahaha so now you're spamming the thread by posting the same thing multiple times. You've got ASD too mister I suggest you research it instead of spamming this thread.
KateWild
JoinedPosts by KateWild
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
Viv, nothing you say is relevant or sensible I have answered you. Stop being silly. You are just making a fool of yourself hahahhahahahaha! but I am having fun LOL
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
Getting back to topic and the OP Again
I have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. However the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a Creator is responsible for life on earth. I have shown my scientific perspective in past posts.
No one yet has shown me how my conclusion is wrong.
Kate xx
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
Besty you have a PM, Viv is like a fly bussing around my head LOL!
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
if its a decent pub in central London - otherwise, no :-)-besty
Okay you pick. I don't know what is and isn't decent any more. Kate xx
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
It's lovely that you have a club dedicated to telling each other what a meanie I am while making stuff up about me.-Viv
More off topic remarks. You can't help yourself. Your motives for being here are not made up it's my opinion. If I tell you I find you confrontational and aggressive and not helpful, you need to stop doing what your doing or you will keep getting what your getting. Perhaps you fancy me, I will fly out to Texas for a meet up.
Stay on topic please
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
One of my beliefs (without evidence) is that its a futile discussion.-besty
hahahaha!!!!! Thanks for joining in anyway besty. Kate xx
P.S. Are you gonna meetup at our next London meetup? Cat hearding hey LOL!
-
113
Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?
by KateWild ini have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.
however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.
i am interested in your views as to his credibility.
-
-
KateWild
Attack? How is pointing out a fact, namely that you denied something and later claimed not to have denied it, an attack? Anyway, I was under the impression you were a chemist. Now that it's clear you are not a chemist, I am no longer under that impression and confusion over your lack of understanding of science is clear. - Viv
Yet more intellectual intimidation and off topic attacks. It's clear that your motive is to deliberately side track posters with personal attacks. I am not making stuff up about you but it's my opinion that you are confrontational and aggressive in a way that I find unhelpful to most posters here. I have had lots of PMs about you from posters who agree with my opinion.
Getting back to topic and the OP
I have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. However the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a Creator is responsible for life on earth. I have shown my scientific perspective in past posts.
No one yet has shown me how my conclusion is wrong.
Kate xx
-
42
Lawrence Krauss
by KateWild inkrauss is an atheist activist and self-described antitheist.
hence his science is biased.
being an antitheist means he's anti god.. anyone disagree?.
-
-
KateWild
As far as any bias; consider your own bias before attacking science. If you have already made up your mind that someone or something is wrong, you can't properly talk about it. Krauss hasn't made up his mind yet, that's the beauty of science.-Anony Mous
No it was for me Bohm. If you read all my posts on this thread you will see I have considered my own bias.
I listened to the promotional video and Krauss is most certainly bias, but he is honest and humble about it. In fact quite endearing, I find him intellectually honest.
32.15secs-33.37
This is where Krauss is talking about the flat universe and said he wanted the answer to be zero because it would mean no diety, he laughs and said, but they calculated and got the wrong number.
1.00.30secs
Krauss is answering a question about infinity, I have thought about this alot too. He says he lies a little bit when he explains it. So here he is being completely open and want people to know his intent is not to mislead.
47-49
In these two minutes he draws his religious conclusions and states what he finds nonsense. But it comes across as more of an opinion than facts. I actually disagree with his coclusions and view things from the opposite perspective.
All in all he's not that bad.
Kate xx
-
42
Lawrence Krauss
by KateWild inkrauss is an atheist activist and self-described antitheist.
hence his science is biased.
being an antitheist means he's anti god.. anyone disagree?.
-
-
KateWild
As for Krauss himself, I got to say I have lost quite a great deal of respect for him as a carefull thinker after seeing the three intellectual disaster that was the three Krauss/Craig debates in Sydney. His book is good, but Craig absolutely tore him apart in those three debates.-Bohm
Thank you for your objectiveness and honesty. I will watch the promotional video from cofty now, and let you know what I think. See you in a hour.
Kate xx