Hi Francois! I myself have come to no conclusions about the soul.I would like to hear your thoughts on what I read in Ray Franz's book "In Search of Christian Freedom"on page 706,707.
He gives the example that the common view among many about the human soul is described by S.C.Guthrie,professor at Columbia Theological Seminary(a Presbyterian institution),in this manner:
According to this doctrine only my body can die,but I myself do not really die.My body is only the shell of my true self.It is not me;it is only the earthly-physical prison in which the real"I" is trapped.My true self is my soul,which,because it is spiritual and not physical,is like God and therefore shares God's immortality ( inability to die).What happens at death,then,is that my immortal soul escapes from my mortal body.My body dies,but I myself live on and return to the spiritual realm from which I came and to which I really belong.
Having said this,this respected theologian then goes on to state:If we hold to the genuinely Bibilical hope for the future,we must firmly reject this doctrine of the soul's immortality for several reasons.
He then proceeds to detail those reasons from Scripture.Before doing so,however,he discusses the origin of the belief he first described,stating:
This doctrine( of the soul's inherent immortality) was not taught by the biblical writer's themselves,but it was common in the Greek and Oriental religions of the ancient world in which the Christian church was born.Some of the earliest Christian theologians were influenced by it,read the Bible in the light of it and introduced it into the thinking of the church.It has been with us ever since,influencing even the reformed confessions.(see the Westminster Confessions,XXXII; the Belgic Confession,Art XXXVII).
Ray himself goes on to say:I present this neither as conclusive nor as a view that all should accede to.To determine whether that view is convincing one would have to read and weigh the validity of his Biblical reasons,which I have not included.
While one could find scores of other scholars who express the same viewpoint as this particular theologian,their numbers or their reputation are not decisive;one can similarly find theologians of repute who argue for a different,contrary view.
My purpose here is not to argue the validity of the view expressed but soley to show that,though there might be the inclination to reject it out of hand as the product of"cult thinking",there are in fact reputable scholars who express that viewpoint.
Francois,this one of the reasons I am not able to come to any conclusion,yet, on this all important subject you have raised about the SOUL!
Blueblades