You are wrong, because you exclude that a hypothesis can be also a speculation. For instance:
According to the above definition, I repeat what I said:
So we have if P => Q, where P is the hypothesis (God exists) and Q is the consequent (he does not interfere in our life).
Of course I'm not. You have no consequent, no proposition. You spent a lot of time researching that only to forget the "then" part. What you have is "I speculate this undetected creature could have this property". It's just antecedant with nothing else. It's still not a hypethesis, it's just speculation.