That's my question. Without those details and verification by other scientists, what makes you say this is conclusive?
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
29
Jack The Ripper Unmasked?
by metatron inhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321/jack-ripper-unmasked-how-amateur-sleuth-used-dna-breakthrough-identify-britains-notorious-criminal-126-years-string-terrible-murders.html.
to be accepted as fact, these claims will have to be replicated.
metatron.
-
-
29
Jack The Ripper Unmasked?
by metatron inhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321/jack-ripper-unmasked-how-amateur-sleuth-used-dna-breakthrough-identify-britains-notorious-criminal-126-years-string-terrible-murders.html.
to be accepted as fact, these claims will have to be replicated.
metatron.
-
Viviane
Ok, but how does *this* seem conclusive?
1) Shawl of unknown origin
2) Armchair detective manages to predict how all of this will turn out
3) No idea how the DNA was extracted, how the descendants DNA was obtained, the quality of the sample or even what type of DNA was involved
4) No published results for others to test and replicate
5) Crytpic messages that leaves convenient clues
6) This was in the Daily Mail
-
29
Jack The Ripper Unmasked?
by metatron inhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321/jack-ripper-unmasked-how-amateur-sleuth-used-dna-breakthrough-identify-britains-notorious-criminal-126-years-string-terrible-murders.html.
to be accepted as fact, these claims will have to be replicated.
metatron.
-
Viviane
How does this seem conclusive?
-
29
Jack The Ripper Unmasked?
by metatron inhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321/jack-ripper-unmasked-how-amateur-sleuth-used-dna-breakthrough-identify-britains-notorious-criminal-126-years-string-terrible-murders.html.
to be accepted as fact, these claims will have to be replicated.
metatron.
-
Viviane
Absolutely. This story is one impossible chance and stroke of luck after another after an armchair detective had to vision to see that this all might work, after every one else missed it. It's even got cryptic clues and foreshadowing. Seems totes legit.
-
59
Want to make Money $ with a Web Site?
by sarahsmile inhas anyone had success with a high traffic website or blog ?.
it might take a team of people to accomplish.. ads pay and people count, lots and lots of people.
does jehovahs-witness.net make money every time someone looks at the web site?
-
Viviane
Not mine :)
-
4
October 4/5 2014 - Armageddon date!
by abbasgreta inmy mother has waived her shunning of me as she is seriously ill. her elders have classed the situation as a 'dire family circumstance' and.
all restrictions have been lifted.
some crazy hypocritical reasonings on the elder's part but who cares?
-
Viviane
JWs are the master of "Free beer tomorrow" to keep people hanging on.
-
59
Want to make Money $ with a Web Site?
by sarahsmile inhas anyone had success with a high traffic website or blog ?.
it might take a team of people to accomplish.. ads pay and people count, lots and lots of people.
does jehovahs-witness.net make money every time someone looks at the web site?
-
Viviane
Here's the reality. Simon maintains a site people want to look at. That costs time and money. Ads are a way to recoup the overhead. If enough people want to look, so much so that he's making money on this rather than just covering expenses, so what?
-
5
Do you have Chromecast?
by Iamallcool inif you do have chromecast, are there any cool apps that you like?
i was wondering can i get text messages on chromecast?.
-
Viviane
I do, i use itnfor Netflix and streaming from a browser, mostly. I also have an Amazon fire TV. It works great.
-
32
Science and Philosephy.- God
by HowTheBibleWasCreated inwhen i discovered ervs and #2 chromosome i knew there was no personal god.
the rest is history.
i have always since kept updated in science as much as possible.. .
-
Viviane
The phrase i said "sub-atomic matter including the original elements," was a list. I was listing the two for the purpose of over-emphasis. I was not trying to say that sub-atomic matter is made up of elements. I should have put a comma between them or just typed elements first to keep from mis-leading.
As I said, it was wrong.
Thats a seperate topic from the original statement within the post I said that nothing was false which only referenced the scientific quotes I used with that single post.
It's extremely relevant. You keep making claims and keep being wrong (and admitting it) and yet try to claim you've not said anything false. At the very least it speaks volumes about your understanding what you're writing.
I did, all of the elements in the human body can be found in stars whether they are small stars, large stars, or supernovae. I previously said "Everything that makes up the human body can be found in a star." You denied it, please tell me which elements viviane, I must be overlooking them.
But that wasn't your claim. Again, this goes directly to whether or not you understand what you are writing.
Your specific claim was, in fact "And yes NDT's quote is relevant in that an exploding star creates ALL of the elements in a human body", not simply that they can be found in stars. So, the claim that an exploding star creates ALL of the elements in the human body is untrue. Stars don't create hydrogen. They are MADE from hydrogen. Hydrogen can be dispersed from stars exploding, but the hydrogen was the thing that formed the star in the first place.
-
11
How many anointed disciples were in the 1st Lord's Meal?
by hardtobeme inaccording to the bible, none... all 12 partook of the emblems.
jesus told them to partake even thought they were not anointed with holy spirit yet.
they were anointed at pentecost.... and judas was present too according to luke 22:21.. watchtower says that luke's chronological order is wrong.
-
Viviane
Because the gospels disagree with each other on several things (the tomb, the last supper, etc.), Christians, including JWs, are forced to to an interesting thing. Not only do they declare each gospel right AND wrong, they synthesize them to create a 4th narrative not found in any of the books!
If we see people doing that today, why are we surpised at all it happened back then? Basically, making it up as you go...