https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
Wrong. im not doing this with you again. Your putting words in my mouth, I positioned the verses TO SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
According to you, those verses speak for themselves (and happen to agree with you). I put no words in your mouth. You claim they speak for themselves and then tell us what they mean. You are the same an every other preaching christian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
I wasn't going to respond to this thread anymore, but I will respond to this. I have not promoted any view of Jesus except specifically, word for word, what the bible and Quran say about him
That is EXACTLY my point. You've not promoted Jesus except when you have and what you feel the Bible and other scripture says about him according to you. Welcome to being exactly like every other Christian in the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
I'm not sure how Ive preached to anyone
You are promoting your version of Jesus. Every Christian does that. You are picking the parts you like and ignoring the rest and telling us they've got it all wrong while telling us your version is right. That's pretty much exactly what Christianity is...
every muslim scholar agrees that the koran denies that Jesus was crucified
How many is every?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
I would argue for example, that persons such as yourself have very valid personal reasons for hating religion and for deciding to have nothing to do with it or its sources. However this does not make you unrighteous, and it is not condemning you especially because what you've done, really, is deny the false christs - which is actually what it directs us to do. Any spite you feel toward the bible is not without reason, and is because of those people.
Would you mind NOT telling other people what they think and why? They (we) are perfectly capable of explaining it ourselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
I will say I believe Jesus was the messiah, that he willingly took this role, and that he died and was raised to heaven.
I also believe that something bad will likely happen to those who have assumed the role of a messenger or Christ, as per Jesus stating it would.
And that all religions following a man today are false.
In the end, what I believe, is that people like you and I and others here who have renounced our religions because of their clear hypocrisies and lies will be saved, as well as all those who are in the religions honestly trying to find truth, as well as all those whomever else the judge finds is a good and righteous person, regardless of any errors they may have made.
So, you say you have renounced religion but believe in Jesus as the Messiah, punishment from heaven, Jesus being raised up, etc. In what sense are you not Christian and operating with confirmation bias? You are starting from the position of "I believe this, let me find things to prove it" rather than the position of "Is there any evidence that would make me believe this?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6e4emx-4k
JD, do you believe in the Bible? That is was inspired by God? If so, in what sense do you believe in the Bible? Literally? That it contains truth but not history? Good ideas?
I ask this because I am trying to figure out your point. Why are you defending the Quran and the Bible but not the Book of Mormon? On what grounds? What is your reasoning or basis for this?
scientists discovered an organism that has not evolved in more than 2 billion years (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150203104131.htm) .
one can dismiss this as an exception*!
yet overwhelming proofs are too obvious to miss if we take the community as an individual (community is the reflection of the behavior pattern of the individuals that make up the whole).
Question is not about the poetic word play. It's about the designer behind the earth which is much more than a home fitted with everything we need not just for our sustenance but for our enjoyment!
There is no evidence of a designer of the earth.
scientists discovered an organism that has not evolved in more than 2 billion years (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150203104131.htm) .
one can dismiss this as an exception*!
yet overwhelming proofs are too obvious to miss if we take the community as an individual (community is the reflection of the behavior pattern of the individuals that make up the whole).
Flying machine without using the air-polluting fuel is not a matter to be laughed at.
I agree, we need science to develop one.
If we remove the alphabet “t” from the word PLANET, we have the word PLANE
If we remove the "e" we have plant! So what?
You and the entire humanity are aboard on this PLANE called earth, and it is flying at a speed of 30 km per second, i.e., 1,08,000 km per hour! [At this speed, the distance to the moon can be covered in just four hours]
Earth is not a plane. It's falling, actually, not flying. Everything you wrote is factually and demonstrably wrong.
scientists discovered an organism that has not evolved in more than 2 billion years (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150203104131.htm) .
one can dismiss this as an exception*!
yet overwhelming proofs are too obvious to miss if we take the community as an individual (community is the reflection of the behavior pattern of the individuals that make up the whole).
My point is that there never never evolution of beings
You started out well....but then derped the derpiest derp I've ever seen derped.
...i has always been a Good Start by God, then deterioration brought out by humans...
Sanskrit word Chumbak Mani (literally translated as the ‘jewel that attracts’) is equivalent to what the modern term SEMICONDUCTOR-MAGNET implie...
... is reported to have synthesized Chumbak Mani by calcining and melting 14 exotic ingredients including buffalo horn and mercury at 1,200° C!
You're demonstrating some interesting congnitive dissonance, both complaining about science, but using science to show how science is not that great.
