its like you two are having a conversation with yourselves - so now who believes in imaginary beings? Caedes and viv
You're the one who thinks child rape has value.
fyi, Viviane, that is called a "straw man" argument ......... I leave it to YOU to figure it out.
It's actually not at all a straw man argument. I'm not sad you've left.
the reasoning seems to follow the line that if you are not with us then you must be against us and if you are against us you must be a theist. I'm more surprised that Caedes seems to be adopting this line of thought than viv.
You've claimed suffering has value. You've been asked if that means child rape has value. You've said it can produce valuable things.
Please tell me which part of your argument I've misrepresented.
here is what viv accuses me of and I thought i was being very clear that I am not arguing this at all
That's exactly 100% what you are arguing.
as to viv's arguments if she had followed my pov without bias then she would clearly see that I am actually arguing the opposite of what she accuses me of here as i am most definitely not arguing that there is value in suffering itself although little socrates may be arguing from that pov.
You've literally said that there was value in suffering, meaning there is value in child rape. Are you now NOT claiming that? How do you mostly not argue it? I've accused you of nothing. I merely state your position and argument.