do any of you ex-jw's still believe in god?
even with the new rebranding/softening of this religion, i still don't see how people can believe in him.
the god of the old testimate is an angry murderer who approved rapes and slavery and killed thousands of men, women and children.
prologos9 minutes ago" short, you are as ill equipped, ill prepared and dishonest", and we thought you promised us smaller words. but you just might be right: short. & short on breath after reading your assessment. 8) Deist
I never promised smaller words.
Try being honest. It might be a refreshing change instead of attempting snark when your bunk is revealed for what it is. I say that because you're terrible at snark and your bunk is just that.
do any of you ex-jw's still believe in god?
even with the new rebranding/softening of this religion, i still don't see how people can believe in him.
the god of the old testimate is an angry murderer who approved rapes and slavery and killed thousands of men, women and children.
You don't have a point. You're using speculation, conflating words with multiple meanings and treating them the same and "not reality" as a basis for "deist-god-dun-it".
In short, you are as ill equipped, ill prepared and dishonest as good old fashioned Christians in your pursuit defending the notion of god, and they're incredibly ill equipped, ill prepared and dishonest.
do any of you ex-jw's still believe in god?
even with the new rebranding/softening of this religion, i still don't see how people can believe in him.
the god of the old testimate is an angry murderer who approved rapes and slavery and killed thousands of men, women and children.
Being an atheist means you positively mean God doesn't exist. Saying there is a possibility there could be some sort of god is agnosticism (which is where I'm at). And like you, I believe is nothing like the stories.
No, it doesn't. It means lacking belief in a god, gods, spirits, a spirit world, the supernatural, etc..
neither, can be proven only to the believer can they exist.
we could therefore say that a persons feelings on god and love are simply chemical reactions produced by the brain.
however what i find interesting is that if a certain part of a persons brain gets damaged their personalities and emotions can radically change.. the rebel..
Yes I see the problem, When I was 18 I once thought and spoke like you. That wasn't the person I wanted to be, so I bought myself that railway ticket and have travelled around, and discovered my 18 year old thinking was really quite, unattractive.
Well, I see in your desperation you're back to attempting to insult and hurt me personally. It was quite ugly of you to boast about that the first time you failed at it, this failure is no prettier.
In any event, you've no idea how I speak or think. Once again, you ignorantly presume more than you can know. Do you see the problem?
neither, can be proven only to the believer can they exist.
we could therefore say that a persons feelings on god and love are simply chemical reactions produced by the brain.
however what i find interesting is that if a certain part of a persons brain gets damaged their personalities and emotions can radically change.. the rebel..
This is just another thread with Rebel seeking validation for his intellectual laziness to sooth the sting from the moon landing thread.
He is trying to convince himself and have someone agree that being intellectually lazy and making baseless and uninformed judgements is equivalent to learning and educating ones self.
It is a fools errand.
neither, can be proven only to the believer can they exist.
we could therefore say that a persons feelings on god and love are simply chemical reactions produced by the brain.
however what i find interesting is that if a certain part of a persons brain gets damaged their personalities and emotions can radically change.. the rebel..
the Rebel ( A) Millions of believers and non believers may prefer to inhale and exhale the breath and the beauty of being alive, to " intellectual" thinking that is nothing more than the monotonous adding up of numbers. They can still appreciate " the wonder and magnificence of life, the universe and everything" perhaps often even more so?
So you admit you aren't intellectual and haven't attempted to ever be so, yet feel comfortable making (erroneous) assertions about something you are ignorant of.
Do you see the problem?
neither, can be proven only to the believer can they exist.
we could therefore say that a persons feelings on god and love are simply chemical reactions produced by the brain.
however what i find interesting is that if a certain part of a persons brain gets damaged their personalities and emotions can radically change.. the rebel..
And my freedom with this railway ticket, is to accept the farmers can teach me to milk cows, and a sailor can teach me to sail a ship, but from a scholarly point of view on God too much thinking is shit, because the philosophers be it athiest or believers in God or Love can't proove a thing in words.
Well, you're certainly proving true your comments about your lack of quality thinking and seem determined to remain in that state.
do any of you ex-jw's still believe in god?
even with the new rebranding/softening of this religion, i still don't see how people can believe in him.
the god of the old testimate is an angry murderer who approved rapes and slavery and killed thousands of men, women and children.
do any of you ex-jw's still believe in god?
even with the new rebranding/softening of this religion, i still don't see how people can believe in him.
the god of the old testimate is an angry murderer who approved rapes and slavery and killed thousands of men, women and children.
neither, can be proven only to the believer can they exist.
we could therefore say that a persons feelings on god and love are simply chemical reactions produced by the brain.
however what i find interesting is that if a certain part of a persons brain gets damaged their personalities and emotions can radically change.. the rebel..
As the moon landing thread showed, Rebel, what you conclude is irrelevant. You've done no work to investigate how science works, not thought about the question and don't even understand why you're in the category of "cake + blue = unicorn" or, in other words, not even wrong.
Equating your lack of investigation, critical thinking and understanding with the rest of us by claiming "witness like behavior" is emphatically wrong and ridiculous.
