It's nice to have dreams.
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
Prologos, you haven't gotten anything right and have been caught lying. Please stop pretending you're the smart one.
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
10 orbit spacings doubling in size, but not exeeding 9.6 AU , starting at .4, not smaller than .3 ! with
Absolutely incorrect.
these 4 parameters have all 10 orbits defined with 5% accuracy.
Absolutely incorrect.
Only because we observe them, it is proven not to be lies.
Absolutely incorrect.
and I am still learning* about spacings, thanks to you, Vivian, Caedes.
You still haven't bothered to learn how to read a chart, you can't be learning much.
* I expect the question and answer session to be on a higher technical level than the discussion here, and I learned from you, and I am faster at repost QUESIONS, orally than on the keyboard.
You haven't learned basic math or how to read a chart, your best bet is that they are higher questions, technically.
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
Why do I scare you?
-
34
Order in the universe
by Rattigan350 inthis topic was covered in book study last night.
some commented that the universe is ordered and the stars don't collide.. that has nothing to do with order.
it is more to do with that there is more space between the stars and planets and things go between them if they were in the same area.. and do they not consider that the many things that colliided with the moon to make those crators?.
-
Viviane
vivian, even if what you say applies. If, as Scientific Amercan wrote " -- will add LUSTER to the Mlky Way--, it would be LUSTER in what shines in the MILKY way?, what is it? STARS, NOVAE, or the gases they iluminate, but STARS that shine.
Your point was about the sun absorbing material to remain shining for long (actually, that would shorten it's lifespan, but whatever), your quote was about something entirely different. Sorry, but you don't get to retro-fit your erroneous claims and now try to say they match something completely different.
just asking: both sides of an equation balance out to zero, but there is there not value on both sides? adding up now , but aslo cancelling out at the end?
Define what you mean by value.
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
the lagrangian points 60 degrees, that is at the RADIUS distance, before and after Jupiter, the Trojan asteroids,( and other bodies) this is compatible with resonance NODES based on the orbit radius, (with its roots in the T&B idea) of course garvity is involved, but it seems to have a wave character.
A meaningless mashup of astronomy terms with nothing to back it up.
For an upcoming presentation at the local Astronomy society I am trying to prepare a striking handout. I have made multiple charts, ruler-like of the spacings in real proportion, about 1mm to the bode no.-- 10 mm for earth orbit. sun to pluto fits on a legal sheet.
Is it comedy night?
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
so, with help from junior, here is a TYPICAL science graph with the 5% scattering of data about an established rule.
Well now you have to explain the chart and how 5% scattering of data means that a law that makes predictions will be off by 5%. You still have all of your work to do...
BSW. the "pushing - 90" remark is also close to the 5% uncertainty margin. but the "2 year old"- is actually 2.208 my fourfold error.
just to show how silly , hollow your objections are.
You simply aren't telling the truth and got caught.
within 5 %: all 10 major orbits in our planetary disk can be found with these parameters:
starting at .4 AU. with orbit radius difference not smaller than .3AU,
A DOUBLING from planet to planet. but
orbital gap not to exceed 9.6 AU.
Which means nothing because that's not what Bode-Titius hypothesis predicted, it's just what is observed (and not even correctly as I had to do some of your math for you when you were way off).
You still haven't proven anything and all your work is ahead of you.
-
224
Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---
by prologos init is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
-
Viviane
no 5% spread about mean in science? please google "main sequence stars" -australian telespope---. and see 5% alive and well in OZ and every where in science, pick your field.
Not lilkely. You made an assertion, now it's on you to back it up with data and examples. At this point it's just someone that has been wrong over and over and over saying something.
obviously I am not relying on Vivian to prove my viability or the other v--ty. but I am flattered by the attention a young lady lavishes on me. 7 pages! wow!
Wrong again. I want to make sure you're pseudo science and woo doesn't infect people that have a chance to learn. This has zero to do with you.
-
112
Supreme Court ruling- refusing to photo gay wedding is discrimination
by SadElder inaccording to bloomberg news:.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-04-07/wedding-photographer-rebuffed-by-top-court-on-same-sex-ceremony.
"the u.s. supreme court turned away an appeal from a new mexico wedding photographer found to have violated a state anti-discrimination law when she refused to take pictures of a commitment ceremony for a same-sex couple.. the photographer, elaine huguenin, argued unsuccessfully that she was being unconstitutionally forced to convey a message conflicting with her religious beliefs.
-
Viviane
No shoes, no shirt, no service. Business can set codes of conduct for customers.
Completely irrelevant.
Forcing people to do work they don't want is slavery.
It is, and no one is being forced to do anything.
Photographers are mostly sole proprietors. In which they can refuse to do any work they want. I had a small business and I could make up any reason to not do work for anyone.
So they can refuse to do any work they don't want to do, as long as they lie about the reason? OK.
While restaurants can put signs up that say "Whites Only". It is private property and they can do what they want.
Actually, that's wrong and wrong.
Today, if a racist waiter sees blacks at a table, he can refuse to serve them and tell another waiter to server them.
Not legally!
If people abused gays, then that is illegal under the assault and battery laws.
That doesn't seem relevant.
-
25
How do you get through the memorial?
by Gorbatchov infor family reasons, gorby and his wife and children has to visit the hall at april 14. our family accept that we are faders, but don't accept if we do not visit the memorial.. so, it seems a small investment: one evening love bombing for a year peace and rest.. but i hate the visit.
headache.
meeting the people knowing it's all fake love showing.. how do you get through it?.
-
Viviane
Apply directly to mouth as needed....