You are neither the first nor the last in a long line of people to claim divine inspiration and string words together and pretend they mean something.
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
42
God listens and RESPONDS to your prayer if you know how to log on to Him! Here is the proof.
by exWTslave inall my family members and friends (that include some elders) advised me to divorce my wife whose only joy was to pick up fight with me for everything i do, except my grand-mother who said: when you married her, you looked for only her good pointher regular pioneering despite having an opposing family.
for being good, you will ultimately reap something far better through her.
stick on to her.
-
-
-
130
Atheists and JWs are on the same footing!
by exWTslave inatheists believe that god should stop the large-scale injustice on earth; if he does'nt, then he does not exist.
jws believe that god will intervene sometime in the last days!.
interestingly, both throw themselves on their own expectation of soemthing god should or will do, yet in fact something god does not have to do.
-
-
Viviane
It does amaze me sometimes how people misrepresent and cling to Einstein as somehow being proof of god. In any equation where god is real, god>Einstein. Why cling to the lesser to prove the greater?
-
130
Atheists and JWs are on the same footing!
by exWTslave inatheists believe that god should stop the large-scale injustice on earth; if he does'nt, then he does not exist.
jws believe that god will intervene sometime in the last days!.
interestingly, both throw themselves on their own expectation of soemthing god should or will do, yet in fact something god does not have to do.
-
-
Viviane
Viv - I am not entirely sure why you are asking me questions. Is it possible you're motives are to be deliberately facetious? Do tell why are you asking me off topic questions?-Kate xx
You said this universe was mathematically perfect. I am just trying to understand what that means and what a mathematically imperfect universe would look like.
If it's off topic, then you shouldn't have mentioned it. If you're not sure why people ask questions, there are classes on basic conversation methods you can take. If you can't explain what it means, you clearly don't understand it and shouldn't have brought it up.
-
40
Stay Alive till '75
by John Chapman in"stay alive till '75.
" remember that?
note: this is the year 5774 not 2014. why didn't they tell you that in 5735 (1975 ad?
-
-
Viviane
BTW, why are drugs the first thing to come up in any converstion that is out of the box?
Because it sounds like the usual ramblings of either a drug addict or mental patient.
-
130
Atheists and JWs are on the same footing!
by exWTslave inatheists believe that god should stop the large-scale injustice on earth; if he does'nt, then he does not exist.
jws believe that god will intervene sometime in the last days!.
interestingly, both throw themselves on their own expectation of soemthing god should or will do, yet in fact something god does not have to do.
-
-
Viviane
The universe is mathematically perfect
What does that mean? What would a mathematically imperfect universe look like and why?
-
371
Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt
by QC inif you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.
this is a game changer.
the bomb!.
-
-
Viviane
HOWEVER it does not do a very good job of explaining how life originated.
It doesn't even attempt to address that issue. Of course it doesn't do a good job of it.
-
28
Question about dinosaurs, prehistoric creatures, and the eventual appearance of humans.
by pronomono inso i was watching shark week a little while ago and i got to the episode on prehistoric sharks.
they, of course, discussed megalodon, but they also talked about other sharks that were vicious, precise hunters.
then i started thinking about other prehistoric creatures..... t-rex, raptors, etc...... all vicious animals.
-
-
Viviane
Im sure that I sound crazy to most, but there is a lot of evidence of cross-breeding in Ancient Liteature, and it is my opinion that many of the Anomalies found in Animal Life exist because of 1,000's of years or Cross-Breeding and experimentation.
Just crazy? No.
-
53
Is there Such a Thing as TIme
by givemejustalittlemoretime inthe present moment is real.
however much you may remember the past or anticipate the future, you live in the present.
the next second of your life is the future.
-
-
Viviane
Time looks like it is real in either case since it marks things off. So maybe we have to wonder if our own consciousness is real.
Spacetime is very real and very much a thing. There are various thoughts around the arrow of time, that's it's tied to the expansion of spacetime, that's it's a measure of the increase of entropy in the universe and it will functionally cease to exists with universal entropy reaches 1, that it's related to the non-reversible nature of wave-function collapse or that there is an interelation between entropy and quantum decoherence that yet to be discovered.
No one knows, exactly. Still a mystery.
-
53
Is there Such a Thing as TIme
by givemejustalittlemoretime inthe present moment is real.
however much you may remember the past or anticipate the future, you live in the present.
the next second of your life is the future.
-
-
Viviane
light has a speed, but also a permanent vector, it comes from the past no matter the direction.
If, as you claim below, it's not a thing, logically it's nothing. How does it have properties?
we send it , or its particles, in the zero-length moment, but it is always vectored into the future.
Again, it can't be an "it" if it's nothing.
Things move through the dimensions.
Time is not a thing.
Spacetime is is something.
-
53
Is there Such a Thing as TIme
by givemejustalittlemoretime inthe present moment is real.
however much you may remember the past or anticipate the future, you live in the present.
the next second of your life is the future.
-
-
Viviane
about whether "c" is the speed of light. Perhaps this might help. The physical constant for light speed in a vacuum is nearly 300,000 km/sec. But in media in which it exhibits refractive properties ( bent), the velocity of light is reduced, if I remember correctly, factpred by the cosine of the angle of refraction. Maybe this has something to do with Viviane's argument?
Nope. The debate isn't about whether c is the speed of light. Of course it is.
But that's not what John Mann said.