by jwfacts 17 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
I have published a new article on Bulgaria and the change to blood transfusion disfellowshipping policy during the 1990's. It outlines what appears to have been perjury by the Watchtower Society, and also is another example of political involvement. It is at http://jwfacts.com/watchtower/bulgaria-blood-transfusions.php
It was quite difficult collating all the information so please let me know of any inconsistencies or errors.
Thanks for your hard work. I think your site is one of the best for helping people who are honest with themselves.
jwfacts.com is AWESOME!
''there certainly can be no doubt that it is [a] direct lie that Witnesses do not face "controls or sanctions" if they have blood.''
I wonder what the European Court of Human Rights would think of this article.
Your hard work and dedication does not go unnoticed or unappreciated, JWfacts.
This is excellent. Thank you.
Thanks for the comments, and TC for spotting the missing word.
I spotted one typo. The word "let" should have been "led".
"We have already seen that the terms of the agreement let to a doctrinal changed to allow Witnesses the right to engage in civilian military service."
Very good material. I was previously unaware that the civil-service change was prompted by the Bulgaria decision.
Does anyone know if responsible parties in the Bulgarian government were ever apprised of the duplicity in the WT's blood transfusion directives?
